H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 2-1

Nicole Pratt holds a 2–1 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicole Pratt leads 2–0 on grass, while Sandrine Testud leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2002 Birmingham round of 16 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Pratt #39 6-4 6-1 Sandrine Testud #10 Match data Jun 14, 2002* R16 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Sandrine Testud #11 6-3 6-1 Nicole Pratt #50 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Nicole Pratt #81 6-3 6-3 Sandrine Testud #12 Match data Jun 10, 1999* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,003 309 237 56.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Sandrine Testud
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,549 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,568 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,561 0 0
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,774 0 0
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,920 0 1
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,945 0 2
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,917 0 2
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,977 0 3
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,846 0 3
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 2004 1–8 11.1% #313 1,725 0 3
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Sandrine Testud
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 7 9 16 43.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 20 10 30 66.7% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 20 12 32 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3%
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 39 17 56 69.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 183 118 301 60.8% 78 66 144 54.2% 19 21 40 47.5% 29 32 61 47.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 48/157 of Nicole Pratt's and 1/9 of Sandrine Testud's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicole Pratt Sandrine Testud
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
30 2003 5/40 0.2 4.4 66.1% 58.7% 43.7% 50.3% 59.6% 53.4% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 6/43 0.2 4.2 65.0% 59.4% 44.8% 55.7% 43.2% 54.1% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 5/25 0.8 5.2 59.5% 65.7% 44.6% 56.6% 40.1% 57.3% 44.7% 2004 1/9 0.0 4.0 64.3% 60.0% 28.0% 61.5% 42.9% 48.6% 41.9%
33 2006 8/20 0.5 2.1 70.5% 55.5% 41.2% 46.6% 36.4% 51.0% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 21/26 1.0 2.3 68.4% 57.3% 43.1% 36.6% 53.8% 53.1% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 3/3 0.0 2.7 71.0% 48.8% 32.7% 31.1% 30.0% 44.7% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48/378 0.6 3.1 67.3% 57.8% 42.6% 43.8% 47.3% 52.8% 41.4% — 1/546 0.0 4.0 64.3% 60.0% 28.0% 61.5% 42.9% 48.6% 41.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Sandrine Testud
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 1990 1484 99.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.16
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 1991 1550 115.1 — — — — +5 -2 — 47.6% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.2 +0.80
20 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 1992 1568 120.4 — — — — +2 -13 -14 42.2% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 +0.18
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 1993 1561 126.2 — — — — +20 -9 — 39.7% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 -1.09
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1994 1605 130.9 — — — — +19 -44 — 45.3% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +0.24
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1995 1737 138.2 — — — — +1 -140 — 55.1% +0.24 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 -0.86
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 1996 1774 140.4 — — — — -7 -110 -241 54.7% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +1.01
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 1997 1921 159.0 — — — — -23 -105 -290 60.1% +0.67 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) 108.5 -0.03
26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 1998 1945 158.8 — — — — -9 -36 -184 63.6% +1.08 19–10 (66%) 10–10 (50%) 106.1 +1.78
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 1999 1901 157.5 — — — — +27 -33 -217 56.7% +0.48 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 +2.23
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 2000 1918 163.3 — — — — +69 -103 -240 56.6% +0.65 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 -2.28
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 2001 1978 158.2 — — — — +16 -130 -244 62.3% +0.97 14–9 (61%) 10–13 (43%) 100.0 -3.00
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 2002 1846 144.7 — — — — +107 +12 -165 52.0% +0.39 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +1.55
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 2004 1726 120.4 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +166 +41 — 26.3% -1.58 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -1.36
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 — 2004 155.8 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +17 -60 -202 55.2% +0.45 98–79 (55%) 64–61 (51%) 103.8 -0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.