H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1

Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2007 Italian Open round of 64 6-7(1) 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamira Paszek 6-7(1) 6-0 6-2 Nicole Pratt #47 Match data May 16, 2007* R64 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.