H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 2-1

Nicole Pratt holds a 2–1 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2007 Indian Wells first round 7-6(4) 2-6 6-3.

AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 6, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Nicole Pratt #47 7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #80 Match data
Apr 18, 2001* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Nicole Pratt #71 6-3 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #74 Match data
May 27, 2000* Madrid WTA 500 QF Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #123 6-3 1-6 6-2 Nicole Pratt #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3