H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nicole Vaidisova vs Cara Black H2H: 1-0
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 1–0 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2004 Tashkent third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2004* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-4 6-3 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Vaidisova | Cara Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |