H2H data updated: 2026-11-09 00:00 UTC

Nicole Vaidisova vs Catalina Castano H2H: 1-1

Nicole Vaidisova and Catalina Castano are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catalina Castano leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2006 Charleston Open round of 32 7-5 6-2.

CZE Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catalina Castano #48 7-5 6-2 Nicole Vaidisova #14 Match data Apr 13, 2006* R32 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Nicole Vaidisova #24 7-5 6-4 Catalina Castano #65 Match data Oct 1, 2005* SF Korea Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Vaidisova — #7 1,981 2,007 155 85 64.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Catalina Castano — #35 623 1,702 85 111 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Vaidisova Catalina Castano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2004 14–5 73.7% #75 1,672 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 2005 45–14 76.3% #15 1,948 0 5 — — — — — — —
17 2006 35–17 67.3% #10 1,936 0 6 — — — — — — —
18 2007 35–14 71.4% #12 1,955 0 6 — — — — — — —
19 2008 17–19 47.2% #41 1,703 0 6 1999 0–1 0.0% #232 1,484 0 0
20 2009 7–12 36.8% #175 1,576 0 6 2000 1–1 50.0% #110 1,487 0 0
21 2010 1–1 50.0% #666 1,577 0 6 2001 5–9 35.7% #144 1,490 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2002 3–2 60.0% #194 1,514 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2003 2–3 40.0% #135 1,519 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2004 5–9 35.7% #113 1,533 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2005 22–18 55.0% #57 1,659 0 0
26 2015 1–3 25.0% #261 1,565 0 6 2006 22–25 46.8% #54 1,543 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2007 12–21 36.4% #112 1,520 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2008 5–10 33.3% #142 1,504 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2009 0–2 0.0% #214 1,476 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2010 5–5 50.0% #189 1,505 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2011 2–1 66.7% #254 1,519 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #232 1,515 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2013 0–2 0.0% #202 1,493 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Vaidisova Catalina Castano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2004 12 4 16 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2005 35 8 43 81.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 16 10 26 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 24 9 33 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 11 13 24 45.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 7 17 58.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2015 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 8 13 21 38.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 14 21 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 54 159 66.0% 26 17 43 60.5% 18 10 28 64.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — 28 46 74 37.8% 56 55 111 50.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 161/240 of Nicole Vaidisova's and 80/174 of Catalina Castano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicole Vaidisova Catalina Castano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2004 1/19 1.0 2.0 51.2% 50.0% 33.3% 14.3% 50.0% 41.9% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2005 17/59 7.0 3.2 61.5% 67.6% 52.6% 54.1% 45.8% 61.8% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 41/52 5.4 3.5 62.1% 68.7% 48.3% 55.4% 42.2% 60.8% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 48/49 6.3 3.4 61.5% 73.7% 49.9% 59.5% 48.0% 64.6% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 31/36 5.2 3.6 61.0% 70.9% 44.7% 49.4% 42.8% 60.6% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 18/19 3.3 4.8 56.2% 63.8% 37.8% 48.5% 47.7% 52.5% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 2/2 5.0 3.0 65.2% 77.4% 35.4% 55.0% 45.8% 62.3% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/5 1.0 2.0 62.5% 45.7% 38.1% 33.3% 33.3% 42.9% 39.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/14 0.3 3.7 64.4% 45.1% 37.0% 43.9% 46.7% 42.2% 37.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/40 3.6 2.8 58.6% 61.1% 43.2% 52.7% 40.0% 53.5% 41.1%
26 2015 3/4 6.3 2.3 63.6% 59.4% 44.6% 48.1% 53.3% 53.7% 41.5% 2006 20/47 2.1 2.7 61.3% 58.8% 42.7% 49.0% 49.5% 52.2% 42.3%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 22/33 1.5 3.3 62.1% 58.1% 43.9% 50.7% 38.5% 52.8% 41.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 11/15 1.4 3.7 61.4% 61.7% 48.0% 58.5% 56.5% 55.8% 42.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 5.0 8.5 54.9% 64.2% 38.5% 51.0% 55.0% 52.6% 43.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 9/10 1.4 4.0 63.4% 60.6% 47.4% 45.7% 45.1% 55.5% 46.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 1.7 11.0 60.6% 60.7% 34.9% 51.9% 55.9% 50.8% 46.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 3.0 9.3 55.0% 58.9% 33.8% 42.4% 39.5% 47.8% 46.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/2 0.0 5.0 48.9% 48.9% 46.8% 60.0% 30.8% 47.8% 47.9%
Career — 161/240 5.6 3.6 61.0% 69.8% 47.0% 54.2% 45.4% 60.9% 43.1% — 80/196 1.8 3.9 61.1% 58.8% 43.4% 50.3% 45.8% 52.6% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Vaidisova Catalina Castano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2004 1672 120.2 -1.78 -0.72 0.682 40.6% +8 -112 — 60.5% +0.53 7–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2005 1948 146.7 +3.98 +0.60 1.172 53.0% 0 -245 -351 67.2% +1.49 16–2 (89%) 8–9 (47%) 110.8 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1937 151.5 +4.00 +0.94 1.131 52.3% -11 -77 -249 63.2% +0.93 11–8 (58%) 4–7 (36%) 98.8 +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1956 155.6 +7.77 +1.32 1.244 54.1% -7 -61 -138 70.1% +1.39 6–7 (46%) 6–4 (60%) 100.0 +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1704 127.7 +3.94 -2.60 1.033 50.4% +34 +78 +128 47.7% -0.15 7–7 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 92.1 -0.24 1999 1484 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
20 2009 1576 103.2 -2.86 -1.96 0.879 47.1% +82 +122 — 36.6% -1.02 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +1.38 2000 1487 104.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — +0.23
21 2010 1577 105.4 +1.21 +0.70 1.062 51.9% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.09 2001 1490 107.2 — — — — +25 +45 — 38.2% -0.88 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +0.20
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1514 106.3 — — — — — +72 — 53.3% -0.13 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.40
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1519 101.5 -0.43 -0.17 0.693 41.3% — +60 — 41.7% -0.92 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.05
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1534 115.0 -2.87 -1.32 0.653 40.4% -58 +59 — 37.1% -0.97 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -0.75
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1659 128.5 -0.94 -1.22 0.884 47.8% -48 +8 — 54.9% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 101.1 -0.06
26 2015 1565 115.0 -0.33 +1.19 0.897 48.2% +67 — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.40 2006 1544 112.6 -3.15 -1.99 0.886 47.4% -44 +184 -90 46.3% -0.27 8–10 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +1.63
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1520 113.0 -1.65 -1.56 0.883 47.1% -28 +175 — 37.0% -1.11 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -0.81
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1504 112.0 -0.13 -1.61 0.950 49.7% +4 +96 — 40.0% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 0–5 (0%) 91.5 -0.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1477 98.1 -1.31 +0.09 0.917 47.9% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1505 109.3 -0.80 +0.20 1.048 50.9% — +82 — 54.2% +0.13 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.55
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1519 102.2 +1.09 +0.50 0.951 49.0% — +89 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1515 101.0 -0.68 -1.14 0.894 47.6% — — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1493 99.9 +1.69 -0.59 0.918 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — -0.13
Career — 2007 146.1 +4.19 0.00 1.102 51.8% +10 -78 -113 60.3% +0.77 49–27 (64%) 23–26 (47%) 103.5 +0.94 — 1702 118.0 -1.52 -1.28 0.901 47.8% -34 +95 -90 44.6% -0.41 33–39 (46%) 21–21 (50%) 97.4 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.