H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nicole Vaidisova vs Catalina Castano H2H: 1-1
Nicole Vaidisova and Catalina Castano are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catalina Castano leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2006 Charleston third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2006* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Catalina Castano | 7-5 6-2 | Nicole Vaidisova | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2005* | Seoul | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 7-5 6-4 | Catalina Castano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Catalina Castano | #1,073 | #35 | 623 | 1,703 | 83 | 109 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Vaidisova | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #194 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #57 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #54 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #254 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |