H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nicole Vaidisova vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 1-0
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 1–0 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2007 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-4 6-3 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Vaidisova | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |