H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nicole Vaidisova vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-1
Martina Hingis holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Vaidisova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2006 Rome third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2006* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 7-5 6-3 | Nicole Vaidisova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Vaidisova | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |