H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nicole Vaidisova vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 2-1
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 2–1 lead over Michaella Krajicek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicole Vaidisova leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Michaella Krajicek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2009 Indian Wells first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2009* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-3 6-4 | Michaella Krajicek | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2007* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Michaella Krajicek | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Nicole Vaidisova | Match data |
| Mar 21, 2007* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | Michaella Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Vaidisova | Michaella Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |