H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Nina Bohm vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-2

Andrea Jaeger holds a 2–0 lead over Nina Bohm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1981 Roland Garros round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nina Bohm
SWE Age 68 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger 6-2 6-4 Nina Bohm Match data Jun 2, 1981* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Andrea Jaeger 6-4 6-2 Nina Bohm Match data Feb 13, 1981* R16 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nina Bohm — — — 1,708 55 64 46.2% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Andrea Jaeger — #3 — 2,265 262 91 74.2% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nina Bohm Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1980 67–18 78.8% #7 2,156 0 5
16 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,181 0 8
17 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 1 1982 65–21 75.6% #3 2,202 0 10
18 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,530 0 1 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,105 0 11
19 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,518 0 1 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,025 0 11
20 1978 11–10 52.4% — 1,649 0 1 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,940 0 11
21 1979 11–11 50.0% — 1,664 0 2 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,915 0 11
22 1980 9–15 37.5% — 1,677 0 2 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,900 0 11
23 1981 19–20 48.7% — 1,664 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nina Bohm Andrea Jaeger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 19 7 26 73.1%
16 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9%
17 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6%
18 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1%
19 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1 7 8 12.5% 16 16 32 50.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 12 20 32 37.5% — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 21 87 75.9% 50 14 64 78.1% 80 34 114 70.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nina Bohm Andrea Jaeger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1522 115.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2157 165.9 — — — — -8 -425 -301 74.7% +1.98 9–3 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 114.0 -6.95
16 1974 1492 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.07 1981 2182 174.7 — — — — +39 -160 -157 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.7 -9.51
17 1975 1497 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.25 — — — +0.31 1982 2203 174.6 — — — — +59 -31 -141 73.9% +1.87 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.79
18 1976 1531 112.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.70 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.02 1983 2105 170.2 — — — — -3 +149 +46 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 -4.08
19 1977 1519 98.6 — — — — — — +9 50.0% -0.29 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.78 1984 2025 144.9 — — — — +15 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.43
20 1978 1649 133.4 — — — — +43 — -15 53.1% +0.29 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 +0.30 1985 1940 112.8 — — — — +12 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.48
21 1979 1665 113.1 — — — — +6 -148 — 48.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 +1.22 1986 1915 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1980 1678 126.4 — — — — -117 -77 -27 39.3% -0.87 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 103.6 -1.51 1987 1901 104.0 — — — — — +248 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.19
23 1981 1664 120.9 — — — — -86 +19 +15 46.2% -0.24 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 100.6 +0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1708 126.2 — — — — -54 -28 -7 46.1% -0.30 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 104.5 +1.50 — 2266 172.3 — — — — +22 -43 -157 71.0% +1.71 46–18 (72%) 22–18 (55%) 109.1 -8.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.