H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nina Bohm vs Betty Stove H2H: 0-1

Betty Stove holds a 1–0 lead over Nina Bohm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Betty Stove leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Betty Stove won the 1978 Brighton quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nina Bohm
SWE Age 68 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Betty Stove
NED Age 81 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Betty Stove 6-1 6-2 Nina Bohm Match data Oct 21, 1978* QF Brighton WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nina Bohm — — — 1,714 55 63 46.6% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Betty Stove — #7 — 2,171 419 307 57.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nina Bohm Betty Stove
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,530 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,518 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1978 11–10 52.4% — 1,648 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1979 11–11 50.0% — 1,664 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1980 9–14 39.1% — 1,684 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1981 19–20 48.7% — 1,665 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — 1969 27–14 65.9% — 1,639 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1970 18–20 47.4% — 1,708 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 1971 51–29 63.8% — 1,800 0 4
27 — — — — — — — 1972 46–25 64.8% — 1,967 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 1973 38–28 57.6% — 1,923 0 8
29 — — — — — — — 1974 24–20 54.5% — 1,958 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 1975 17–18 48.6% — 1,962 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 1976 37–20 64.9% #7 2,086 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 1977 46–25 64.8% #7 2,073 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 1978 51–24 68.0% #9 2,076 0 8
34 — — — — — — — 1979 26–24 52.0% — 1,904 0 8
35 — — — — — — — 1980 24–23 51.1% — 1,840 0 8
36 — — — — — — — 1981 5–20 20.0% — 1,695 0 8
37 — — — — — — — 1982 9–15 37.5% — 1,672 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,630 0 8

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nina Bohm Betty Stove
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1974 1492 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1975 1497 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.25 — — — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1976 1531 112.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.70 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1977 1519 98.6 — — — — — — +8 50.0% -0.29 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1978 1649 133.2 — — — — +45 — -15 53.1% +0.29 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1979 1664 113.1 — — — — +7 -148 — 48.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 +1.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1980 1684 128.0 — — — — -108 -84 -33 40.7% -0.80 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 103.4 -1.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 1666 120.7 — — — — -79 +16 +13 46.2% -0.24 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 100.5 +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1640 122.6 — — — — +178 -76 -43 66.3% +1.17 5–7 (42%) — — +3.66
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1708 123.3 — — — — -25 -123 -13 46.5% -0.17 6–6 (50%) — — -0.85
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1801 147.0 — — — — -99 +35 +44 61.5% +0.86 12–16 (43%) 7–1 (88%) 102.6 -1.34
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1968 154.8 — — — — -73 -37 +44 61.5% +0.73 14–7 (67%) 7–4 (64%) 110.1 -8.24
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1923 154.1 — — — — +22 +28 +18 55.8% +0.50 9–8 (53%) 6–8 (43%) 98.5 -10.73
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1959 153.1 — — — — 0 +50 -54 54.2% +0.23 6–6 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.6 -9.60
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1962 152.1 — — — — -51 +58 -20 48.8% -0.22 8–8 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 103.9 -5.95
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 2086 160.5 — — — — -55 -98 -2 62.5% +1.06 8–8 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -8.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 2074 163.1 — — — — +16 -50 +40 60.6% +0.81 11–8 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 98.9 -6.03
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2076 159.6 — — — — +18 — +42 62.4% +0.65 13–6 (68%) 11–8 (58%) 104.2 -3.70
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1905 150.7 — — — — -22 +107 +204 53.6% +0.27 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) 96.3 -2.84
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1840 138.2 — — — — -138 +123 +266 51.4% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) 98.0 -4.96
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1695 131.2 — — — — -30 +175 +304 28.3% -1.50 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -3.68
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1673 118.2 — — — — -130 +120 +243 39.6% -0.49 2–5 (29%) 4–4 (50%) 93.3 -2.06
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1631 88.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +0.30
Career — 1714 126.5 — — — — -47 -32 -8 46.4% -0.28 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 104.3 +1.64 — 2172 155.1 — — — — -20 +7 +76 56.2% +0.43 107–107 (50%) 70–51 (58%) 103.1 -8.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.