H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nina Bohm vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 1-0
Nina Bohm holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nina Bohm leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nina Bohm won the 1981 Cincinnati third round 2-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 68
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 1981* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Nina Bohm | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nina Bohm | — | — | — | 1,714 | 55 | 63 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nina Bohm | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1978 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1979 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1980 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1981 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 |