H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Nina Bohm vs Corinne Vanier H2H: 0-1

Corinne Vanier holds a 1–0 lead over Nina Bohm in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Corinne Vanier won the 1979 Gothenburg round of 16 6-2 7-6.

SWE Age 68 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Corinne Vanier 6-2 7-6 Nina Bohm Match data Dec 12, 1979* R16 Gothenburg WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nina Bohm — — — 1,708 55 64 46.2% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Corinne Vanier — — — 1,643 43 91 32.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nina Bohm Corinne Vanier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,510 0 0
16 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1980 0–3 0.0% — 1,472 0 0
17 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 1 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,529 0 0
18 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,530 0 1 1982 10–17 37.0% — 1,609 0 0
19 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,518 0 1 1983 12–21 36.4% — 1,603 0 0
20 1978 11–10 52.4% — 1,649 0 1 1984 11–20 35.5% — 1,574 0 0
21 1979 11–11 50.0% — 1,664 0 2 1985 2–13 13.3% — 1,492 0 0
22 1980 9–15 37.5% — 1,677 0 2 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
23 1981 19–20 48.7% — 1,664 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nina Bohm Corinne Vanier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1981 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1983 3 7 10 30.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1984 5 8 13 38.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
21 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
22 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1 7 8 12.5% 16 16 32 50.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 12 20 32 37.5% — 17 24 41 41.5% 10 29 39 25.6% 12 24 36 33.3% 2 11 13 15.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nina Bohm Corinne Vanier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1510 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.10 0–2 2–0 — +0.04
16 1974 1492 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.07 1980 1473 92.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -3.29 0–1 — — +0.40
17 1975 1497 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.25 — — — +0.31 1981 1529 114.5 — — — — +80 +5 +18 34.9% -1.56 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.10
18 1976 1531 112.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.70 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.02 1982 1610 108.7 — — — — -9 -136 -21 36.1% -1.18 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 105.9 -0.38
19 1977 1519 98.6 — — — — — — +9 50.0% -0.29 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.78 1983 1604 109.0 — — — — -54 -54 -5 37.3% -0.85 5–4 (56%) 3–5 (38%) 100.6 +0.14
20 1978 1649 133.4 — — — — +43 — -15 53.1% +0.29 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 +0.30 1984 1575 104.7 — — — — -67 -44 +33 40.0% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 5–4 (56%) 96.9 +1.49
21 1979 1665 113.1 — — — — +6 -148 — 48.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 +1.22 1985 1493 105.0 — — — — +15 -48 +31 18.8% -2.25 0–2 1–4 (20%) — -0.42
22 1980 1678 126.4 — — — — -117 -77 -27 39.3% -0.87 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 103.6 -1.51 1986 1483 103.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.17
23 1981 1664 120.9 — — — — -86 +19 +15 46.2% -0.24 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 100.6 +0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1708 126.2 — — — — -54 -28 -7 46.1% -0.30 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 104.5 +1.50 — 1643 109.6 — — — — -17 -62 +9 35.3% -1.20 14–21 (40%) 16–17 (48%) 97.2 +0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.