H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nina Bohm vs Heidi Eisterlehner H2H: 1-0
Nina Bohm holds a 1–0 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nina Bohm leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nina Bohm won the 1981 Wimbledon second round 7-6 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 68
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Nina Bohm | 7-6 4-6 6-2 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nina Bohm | — | — | — | 1,714 | 55 | 63 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nina Bohm | Heidi Eisterlehner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1980 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |