H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Nina Bohm vs Lena Sandin H2H: 0-1

Lena Sandin holds a 1–0 lead over Nina Bohm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lena Sandin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lena Sandin won the 1981 Los Angeles round of 32 5-7 7-6 6-2.

SWE Age 68 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lena Sandin 5-7 7-6 6-2 Nina Bohm Match data Mar 5, 1981* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nina Bohm — — — 1,708 55 64 46.2% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Lena Sandin — #297 0 1,767 62 52 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nina Bohm Lena Sandin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 1 1979 7–3 70.0% — 1,620 0 2
18 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,530 0 1 1980 17–12 58.6% — 1,737 0 4
19 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,518 0 1 1981 12–9 57.1% — 1,737 0 5
20 1978 11–10 52.4% — 1,649 0 1 1982 13–10 56.5% — 1,707 0 7
21 1979 11–11 50.0% — 1,664 0 2 1983 13–18 41.9% — 1,628 0 7
22 1980 9–15 37.5% — 1,677 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1981 19–20 48.7% — 1,664 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nina Bohm Lena Sandin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1979 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1981 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
20 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1983 5 7 12 41.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1 7 8 12.5% 16 16 32 50.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 12 20 32 37.5% — 9 12 21 42.9% 44 23 67 65.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 14 19 26.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nina Bohm Lena Sandin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1974 1492 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1975 1497 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.25 — — — +0.31 1979 1620 118.5 — — — — +44 -4 — 55.0% +0.60 3–1 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 102.2 +1.39
18 1976 1531 112.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.70 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.02 1980 1737 139.3 — — — — -112 +86 — 54.4% +0.50 7–3 (70%) 3–2 (60%) 107.9 -0.35
19 1977 1519 98.6 — — — — — — +9 50.0% -0.29 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.78 1981 1737 122.1 — — — — -86 +109 — 55.1% +0.22 6–3 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 106.0 +2.24
20 1978 1649 133.4 — — — — +43 — -15 53.1% +0.29 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 +0.30 1982 1708 115.9 — — — — -115 +138 — 51.9% -0.06 5–1 (83%) 1–1 — +0.83
21 1979 1665 113.1 — — — — +6 -148 — 48.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 +1.22 1983 1629 109.3 — — — — -80 +174 — 44.3% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 6–3 (67%) 97.7 +2.66
22 1980 1678 126.4 — — — — -117 -77 -27 39.3% -0.87 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 103.6 -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 1664 120.9 — — — — -86 +19 +15 46.2% -0.24 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 100.6 +0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1708 126.2 — — — — -54 -28 -7 46.1% -0.30 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 104.5 +1.50 — 1768 126.4 — — — — -76 +115 — 51.4% +0.05 24–13 (65%) 18–9 (67%) 109.9 +5.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.