H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Nina Bohm vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 0-4

Mima Jausovec holds a 4–0 lead over Nina Bohm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 4–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1980 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 32 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nina Bohm
SWE Age 68 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 4
4 main-draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 6-1 6-3 Nina Bohm Match data Nov 13, 1980* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 7-6 6-2 Nina Bohm Match data Jan 31, 1980* R32 Seattle WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 2-6 6-3 6-1 Nina Bohm Match data Nov 10, 1979* QF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-1 3-6 6-2 Nina Bohm Match data Feb 22, 1979* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nina Bohm — — — 1,708 55 64 46.2% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nina Bohm Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 1 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
18 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,530 0 1 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
19 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,518 0 1 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4
20 1978 11–10 52.4% — 1,649 0 1 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
21 1979 11–11 50.0% — 1,664 0 2 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
22 1980 9–15 37.5% — 1,677 0 2 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6
23 1981 19–20 48.7% — 1,664 0 2 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6
24 — — — — — — — 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6
25 — — — — — — — 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7
26 — — — — — — — 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7
27 — — — — — — — 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7
28 — — — — — — — 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7
29 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nina Bohm Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 1 7 8 12.5% 16 16 32 50.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 12 20 32 37.5% — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nina Bohm Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
16 1974 1492 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.07 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17
17 1975 1497 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.25 — — — +0.31 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15
18 1976 1531 112.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.70 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.02 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20
19 1977 1519 98.6 — — — — — — +9 50.0% -0.29 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.78 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08
20 1978 1649 133.4 — — — — +43 — -15 53.1% +0.29 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 +0.30 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46
21 1979 1665 113.1 — — — — +6 -148 — 48.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 +1.22 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09
22 1980 1678 126.4 — — — — -117 -77 -27 39.3% -0.87 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 103.6 -1.51 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01
23 1981 1664 120.9 — — — — -86 +19 +15 46.2% -0.24 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 100.6 +0.74 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
Career — 1708 126.2 — — — — -54 -28 -7 46.1% -0.30 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 104.5 +1.50 — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.