H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Nina Bohm vs Sylvia Hanika H2H: 0-1

Sylvia Hanika holds a 1–0 lead over Nina Bohm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sylvia Hanika leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1981 Cincinnati Open round of 16 3-6 6-2 6-3.

SWE Age 68 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
GER Age 66 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sylvia Hanika 3-6 6-2 6-3 Nina Bohm Match data Jan 23, 1981* R16 Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nina Bohm — — — 1,708 55 64 46.2% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Sylvia Hanika — #5 48 2,137 415 239 63.5% 0 0 1 0 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nina Bohm Sylvia Hanika
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,533 0 0
17 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 1 1977 5–3 62.5% — 1,583 0 0
18 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,530 0 1 1978 27–14 65.9% — 1,817 0 1
19 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,518 0 1 1979 26–16 61.9% — 1,950 0 3
20 1978 11–10 52.4% — 1,649 0 1 1980 40–22 64.5% — 2,003 0 4
21 1979 11–11 50.0% — 1,664 0 2 1981 61–23 72.6% #6 2,085 0 6
22 1980 9–15 37.5% — 1,677 0 2 1982 41–23 64.1% #10 1,946 0 7
23 1981 19–20 48.7% — 1,664 0 2 1983 47–22 68.1% #5 1,970 0 7
24 — — — — — — — 1984 29–20 59.2% #17 1,880 0 8
25 — — — — — — — 1985 22–16 57.9% — 1,868 0 8
26 — — — — — — — 1986 14–14 50.0% #50 1,803 0 9
27 — — — — — — — 1987 32–19 62.7% #14 1,919 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 1988 44–22 66.7% #17 1,919 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1989 18–14 56.2% #41 1,806 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1990 7–10 41.2% #123 1,702 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nina Bohm Sylvia Hanika
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1977 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0%
19 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1979 5 5 10 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
20 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
21 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1981 15 6 21 71.4% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 26 10 36 72.2%
22 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4%
23 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 28 12 40 70.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 10 6 16 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 8 19 57.9%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 1 7 8 12.5% 16 16 32 50.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 12 20 32 37.5% — 99 60 159 62.3% 129 64 193 66.8% 38 32 70 54.3% 144 80 224 64.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nina Bohm Sylvia Hanika
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1974 1492 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.07 1976 1533 101.8 — — — — +88 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 1–1 — +0.64
17 1975 1497 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.25 — — — +0.31 1977 1584 118.4 — — — — +75 -25 — 55.6% +1.28 2–0 1–1 — +1.84
18 1976 1531 112.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.70 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.02 1978 1817 145.6 — — — — -62 -183 -96 62.6% +1.14 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.8 +0.65
19 1977 1519 98.6 — — — — — — +9 50.0% -0.29 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.78 1979 1951 158.3 — — — — -90 -104 -188 57.9% +0.65 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 106.6 -2.46
20 1978 1649 133.4 — — — — +43 — -15 53.1% +0.29 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 +0.30 1980 2003 159.4 — — — — +15 -68 -218 61.3% +0.93 11–4 (73%) 4–5 (44%) 105.0 -6.31
21 1979 1665 113.1 — — — — +6 -148 — 48.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 +1.22 1981 2085 166.5 — — — — -7 +24 — 68.4% +1.72 12–7 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.1 -8.73
22 1980 1678 126.4 — — — — -117 -77 -27 39.3% -0.87 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 103.6 -1.51 1982 1946 157.2 — — — — +137 +62 -221 64.4% +1.18 8–7 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 94.3 -1.96
23 1981 1664 120.9 — — — — -86 +19 +15 46.2% -0.24 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 100.6 +0.74 1983 1971 163.0 — — — — +82 +36 -191 63.4% +1.12 17–8 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 -1.30
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1880 145.2 — — — — +103 +50 -140 58.5% +0.42 10–4 (71%) 5–0 (100%) 105.7 -0.38
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1868 147.5 — — — — +28 +92 — 59.5% +0.67 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) 99.6 -2.52
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1804 136.3 — — — — +9 +158 -98 51.6% -0.02 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.6 -0.59
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1920 155.2 — — — — +18 +3 -153 62.2% +0.91 7–10 (41%) 3–5 (38%) 96.5 -1.48
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1919 153.4 — — — — +53 +15 -188 61.6% +0.85 14–5 (74%) 5–4 (56%) 102.8 -1.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1806 132.5 — — — — +29 +122 — 52.9% +0.26 9–1 (90%) 4–4 (50%) 103.4 +0.41
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1703 116.6 — — — — +42 +152 — 50.0% -0.35 2–6 (25%) — — +0.81
Career — 1708 126.2 — — — — -54 -28 -7 46.1% -0.30 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 104.5 +1.50 — 2138 160.0 — — — — +39 +22 -162 61.2% +0.90 114–67 (63%) 50–53 (49%) 100.0 -3.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.