H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nina Bohm vs Virginia Ruzici H2H: 0-5
Virginia Ruzici holds a 5–0 lead over Nina Bohm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1981 Wimbledon third round 3-6 7-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 68
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
5
5 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Virginia Ruzici | 3-6 7-6 8-6 | Nina Bohm | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1980* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Virginia Ruzici | 6-0 6-3 | Nina Bohm | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1980* | Bastad | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 6-3 7-5 | Nina Bohm | Match data |
| May 8, 1980* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 7-6 6-0 | Nina Bohm | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1978* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Virginia Ruzici | 5-7 7-6 6-3 | Nina Bohm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nina Bohm | — | — | — | 1,714 | 55 | 63 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Virginia Ruzici | #264 | #16 | 5 | 2,121 | 458 | 274 | 62.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nina Bohm | Virginia Ruzici | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1978 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1979 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1980 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1981 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 59–26 | 69.4% | — | 2,093 | 1 | 8 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 52–27 | 65.8% | — | 1,966 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 73–26 | 73.7% | — | 2,027 | 1 | 12 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 61–30 | 67.0% | — | 1,920 | 1 | 14 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 18 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,905 | 1 | 19 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #44 | 1,780 | 1 | 19 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,786 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,734 | 1 | 20 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #143 | 1,658 | 1 | 20 |