H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nina Bohm vs Virginia Ruzici H2H: 0-5

Virginia Ruzici holds a 5–0 lead over Nina Bohm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1981 Wimbledon round of 32 3-6 7-6 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nina Bohm
SWE Age 68 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 5
5 main-draw meetings
Virginia Ruzici
ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruzici 3-6 7-6 8-6 Nina Bohm Match data Jun 28, 1981* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Virginia Ruzici 6-0 6-3 Nina Bohm Match data Aug 29, 1980* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Virginia Ruzici 6-3 7-5 Nina Bohm Match data Jul 20, 1980* F Bastad WTA 250 Clay
Virginia Ruzici 7-6 6-0 Nina Bohm Match data May 8, 1980* R32 Perugia WTA 250 Clay
Virginia Ruzici 5-7 7-6 6-3 Nina Bohm Match data Oct 28, 1978* QF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nina Bohm — — — 1,714 55 63 46.6% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Virginia Ruzici #264 #16 5 2,123 455 274 62.4% 1 0 0 1 17 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nina Bohm Virginia Ruzici
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 1 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,530 0 1 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,493 0 0
19 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,518 0 1 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,647 0 2
20 1978 11–10 52.4% — 1,648 0 1 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,686 0 3
21 1979 11–11 50.0% — 1,664 0 2 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,797 0 3
22 1980 9–14 39.1% — 1,684 0 2 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,919 0 4
23 1981 19–20 48.7% — 1,665 0 2 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,092 1 8
24 — — — — — — — 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,974 1 8
25 — — — — — — — 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,031 1 12
26 — — — — — — — 1981 58–30 65.9% — 1,919 1 13
27 — — — — — — — 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,983 1 17
28 — — — — — — — 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,905 1 18
29 — — — — — — — 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,780 1 18
30 — — — — — — — 1985 27–19 58.7% #48 1,786 1 19
31 — — — — — — — 1986 0–2 0.0% #185 1,734 1 19
32 — — — — — — — 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,657 1 19

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nina Bohm Virginia Ruzici
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1973 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
19 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
20 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1976 — — — — 28 12 40 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5%
23 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1978 14 9 23 60.9% 19 4 23 82.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 11 27 59.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 15 9 24 62.5%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 14 5 19 73.7% 27 5 32 84.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 24 11 35 68.6%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 27 8 35 77.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 16 13 29 55.2%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 10 5 15 66.7% 24 5 29 82.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 6 8 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 7 6 13 53.8% 17 6 23 73.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 1 7 8 12.5% 16 16 32 50.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 12 19 31 38.7% — 69 55 124 55.6% 218 85 303 71.9% 43 34 77 55.8% 114 96 210 54.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nina Bohm Virginia Ruzici
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1974 1492 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1975 1497 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.25 — — — +0.31 1972 1484 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15
18 1976 1531 112.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.70 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.06 1973 1494 102.8 — — — — +96 -24 — 33.3% -1.19 0–1 0–1 — +0.98
19 1977 1519 98.6 — — — — — — +8 50.0% -0.29 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.77 1974 1647 134.9 — — — — -93 +57 -167 56.8% +0.64 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 102.5 +1.04
20 1978 1649 133.2 — — — — +45 — -15 53.1% +0.29 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 +0.41 1975 1686 122.9 — — — — — +81 — 51.6% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.38
21 1979 1664 113.1 — — — — +7 -148 — 48.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 +1.29 1976 1797 142.1 — — — — -255 +110 -321 58.1% +0.62 9–8 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 100.1 -1.76
22 1980 1684 128.0 — — — — -108 -84 -33 40.7% -0.80 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 103.4 -1.64 1977 1920 148.2 — — — — -145 +43 — 50.0% +0.01 11–3 (79%) 1–0 — -5.12
23 1981 1666 120.7 — — — — -79 +16 +13 46.2% -0.24 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 100.5 +0.79 1978 2092 158.8 — — — — -38 -54 -463 66.3% +1.06 14–6 (70%) 14–6 (70%) 111.1 -7.09
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1975 151.3 — — — — +50 +39 -193 63.7% +0.92 15–10 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -3.12
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2032 157.7 — — — — +31 +158 -224 69.9% +1.37 14–9 (61%) 10–7 (59%) 101.1 -5.80
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1919 158.9 — — — — -19 +290 -67 62.6% +0.85 13–7 (65%) 9–6 (60%) 102.2 -6.70
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1984 156.4 — — — — -61 +260 -118 68.6% +1.30 9–11 (45%) 11–6 (65%) 98.3 -4.11
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1905 143.8 — — — — +21 +136 -21 60.4% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +2.73
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1781 144.3 — — — — -45 +178 — 51.0% +0.29 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 87.0 -0.89
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1786 140.6 — — — — -87 +216 +68 57.4% +0.63 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1735 90.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.44
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1658 111.9 — — — — — +211 — 46.4% -0.14 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.99
Career — 1714 126.5 — — — — -47 -32 -8 46.4% -0.28 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 104.3 +1.64 — 2123 154.7 — — — — -27 +141 -197 61.0% +0.79 108–81 (57%) 70–52 (57%) 104.0 -3.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.