H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Noelle Van Lottum vs Tessa Price H2H: 1-0

Noelle Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Tessa Price in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Noelle Van Lottum leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Noelle Van Lottum won the 1995 Jakarta round of 64 7-5 5-7 2-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Noelle Van Lottum
FRA Age 54
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tessa Price
RSA Age 59 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Noelle Van Lottum 7-5 5-7 2-1 (ret.) Tessa Price #135 Match data Jan 4, 1995* R64 Jakarta Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Noelle Van Lottum — — — 1,646 56 96 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tessa Price #604 #101 16 1,500 8 24 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Noelle Van Lottum Tessa Price
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1988 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 3–2 60.0% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1990 3–2 60.0% — 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 8–15 34.8% — 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 17–20 45.9% — 1,610 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1993 13–21 38.2% — 1,582 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1994 7–12 36.8% — 1,575 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1995 1–9 10.0% — 1,465 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1996 0–2 0.0% — 1,441 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1997 2–9 18.2% — 1,426 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1998 1–2 33.3% — 1,428 0 1 1992 0–1 0.0% #110 1,489 0 0
26 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,416 0 1 1993 1–11 8.3% #155 1,403 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1994 6–10 37.5% #136 1,474 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1995 1–2 33.3% #247 1,475 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Noelle Van Lottum Tessa Price
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1988 1507 102.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 1533 105.7 — — — — +43 — — 53.3% +0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1581 116.6 — — — — +44 — — 60.0% -0.10 — 1–0 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1532 111.1 — — — — +43 +16 — 38.8% -0.80 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1610 125.2 — — — — +39 -43 — 48.1% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 5–1 (83%) 101.6 +1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1583 123.6 — — — — +35 -30 — 40.7% -0.57 6–9 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 1576 110.9 — — — — +14 +11 — 40.0% -1.15 4–2 (67%) — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 1465 92.1 — — — — +55 +58 — 11.1% -3.06 0–2 2–0 — +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 1442 96.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 1427 107.1 — — — — +69 +66 +36 26.9% -1.35 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1429 97.9 — — — — — +33 — 44.4% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.19 1992 1489 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
26 1999 1416 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09 1993 1403 96.3 — — — — +33 — — 21.4% -1.50 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — +0.44
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1474 108.9 — — — — +6 — +50 40.0% -0.83 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.0 -0.39
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1475 104.0 — — — — 0 — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 — — -0.08
Career — 1646 119.1 — — — — +39 -1 +36 40.7% -0.78 20–29 (41%) 12–11 (52%) 99.0 +3.20 — 1500 103.6 — — — — +16 — +50 31.4% -1.10 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 98.9 +0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.