H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Norma Marsh vs Patricia Coleman H2H: 0-1

Patricia Coleman holds a 1–0 lead over Norma Marsh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Coleman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patricia Coleman won the 1972 Sydney International round of 16 6-3 6-4.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Coleman 6-3 6-4 Norma Marsh Match data Jan 8, 1972* R16 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Norma Marsh 1,525 6 9 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patricia Coleman 1,831 63 53 54.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Norma Marsh Patricia Coleman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 1–2 33.3% 1,492 0 0
17 1970 2–2 50.0% 1,519 0 0
18 1971 3–6 33.3% 1,548 0 0
19 1972 40–16 71.4% 1,831 0 1
20 1973 11–14 44.0% 1,714 0 1
21 1974 4–9 30.8% 1,577 0 1
24 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,577 0 1
25 1978 2–3 40.0% 1,574 0 1
33 1969 1–2 33.3% 1,508 0 0
34 1970 1–2 33.3% 1,497 0 0
35 1971 2–2 50.0% 1,509 0 0
36 1972 1–2 33.3% 1,496 0 0
37 1973 1–1 50.0% 1,512 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Norma Marsh Patricia Coleman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1493 102.7 33.3% -0.67 +0.20
17 1970 1520 110.1 +9 44.4% -0.56 1–0 +0.11
18 1971 1549 134.3 +49 40.0% -0.70 0–2 0–1 -0.46
19 1972 1831 133.8 -91 +34 66.4% +0.96 10–1 (91%) 7–2 (78%) 115.8 +2.43
20 1973 1715 131.1 -64 -33 +36 46.3% -0.06 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +0.56
21 1974 1577 95.0 +22 +74 36.7% -1.33 1–3 (25%) +2.64
24 1977 1577 110.7 0.0% -5.00 -0.30
25 1978 1574 104.2 +53 41.7% -1.00 1–1 +0.48
33 1969 1508 102.5 +29 33.3% -1.33 -0.13
34 1970 1497 101.8 +30 42.9% -0.14 0–1 +0.60
35 1971 1509 106.6 +41 50.0% +0.25 0–1 +0.80
36 1972 1497 103.9 33.3% 0.00 0–1 +0.35
37 1973 1512 101.0 100.0% +1.50 1–0 +0.04
Career 1525 106.2 +34 44.8% -0.14 0–1 1–2 (33%) +11.86 1831 131.0 -64 -55 +42 53.2% +0.10 14–10 (58%) 8–5 (62%) 108.0 +4.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.