H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nuria Llagostera Vives vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 0-1
Asa Carlsson holds a 1–0 lead over Nuria Llagostera Vives in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Asa Carlsson won the 2001 US Open first round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
156 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Asa Carlsson | 6-0 6-4 | Nuria Llagostera Vives | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | #775 | #35 | 968 | 1,685 | 77 | 110 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #192 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #50 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #275 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #68 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #131 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |