H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nuria Llagostera Vives vs Ludmila Cervanova H2H: 1-0
Nuria Llagostera Vives holds a 1–0 lead over Ludmila Cervanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nuria Llagostera Vives leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nuria Llagostera Vives won the 2004 Sopot fourth round 6-7(4) 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
156 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2004* | Sopot | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Nuria Llagostera Vives | 6-7(4) 6-1 7-5 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | #775 | #35 | 968 | 1,685 | 77 | 110 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nuria Llagostera Vives | Ludmila Cervanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #192 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #50 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #275 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #68 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #131 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |