H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Olga Barabanschikova vs Florencia Labat H2H: 0-2

Florencia Labat holds a 2–0 lead over Olga Barabanschikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1997 US Open round of 32 4-6 7-6 6-1.

BLR Age 46 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florencia Labat #40 4-6 7-6 6-1 Olga Barabanschikova #91 Match data Aug 31, 1997* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Florencia Labat #43 6-1 7-6 Olga Barabanschikova #94 Match data May 7, 1997* R64 Italian Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Olga Barabanschikova #438 #49 520 1,671 54 76 41.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,867 191 184 50.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olga Barabanschikova Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,482 0 0
16 1996 0–2 0.0% #169 1,485 0 0
17 1997 10–10 50.0% #58 1,598 0 0
18 1998 16–18 47.1% #61 1,651 0 0 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 1999 13–21 38.2% #89 1,555 0 0 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 2000 13–16 44.8% #74 1,558 0 0 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 2001 0–5 0.0% #498 1,495 0 0 1992 18–17 51.4% #52 1,729 0 0
22 2002 0–2 0.0% #181 1,467 0 0 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,762 0 0
23 2003 2–2 50.0% #146 1,499 0 0 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,787 0 0
24 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,780 0 0
25 1996 25–18 58.1% #42 1,771 0 0
26 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 2000 8–10 44.4% #106 1,609 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Olga Barabanschikova Florencia Labat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1996 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1997 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1998 14 10 24 58.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 11 10 21 52.4%
21 2001 0 5 5 0.0% 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 24 12 36 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 11 8 19 57.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 30 41 71 42.3% 16 27 43 37.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 106 84 190 55.8% 66 73 139 47.5% 12 12 24 50.0% 7 15 22 31.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Olga Barabanschikova Florencia Labat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1483 97.1 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.18
16 1996 1485 108.8 20.0% -1.40 0–1 -0.08
17 1997 1599 122.9 -5 -48 +45 46.5% -0.30 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 +0.85
18 1998 1652 121.4 +48 -186 -21 47.4% -0.26 6–8 (43%) 7–5 (58%) 101.1 +1.90 1989 1546 110.9 +37 +1 47.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.8 +1.52
19 1999 1556 109.7 +41 -38 +20 41.7% -0.45 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 97.0 +0.76 1990 1573 118.7 +20 -15 42.5% -0.55 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) 104.5 +1.08
20 2000 1559 118.0 +15 -55 +90 44.6% -0.21 4–7 (36%) 2–2 (50%) 97.8 +0.66 1991 1671 134.2 -10 -1 48.8% -0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 106.9 -0.64
21 2001 1496 96.3 0 0.0% -2.70 0–2 +0.04 1992 1730 132.2 +20 -68 50.6% +0.11 6–7 (46%) 0–1 +0.14
22 2002 1467 97.2 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 +0.13 1993 1762 141.4 -20 +7 -160 56.0% +0.68 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.9 -1.64
23 2003 1500 108.6 -12 44.4% -0.78 1–0 1–0 +0.12 1994 1788 139.9 -25 -123 58.3% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 -0.06
24 1995 1781 133.7 -26 +8 50.8% +0.17 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) -0.32
25 1996 1772 142.8 +32 -66 -49 57.0% +0.70 9–7 (56%) 4–4 (50%) 98.7 +0.20
26 1997 1675 134.1 +5 +54 +73 48.1% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 +1.02
27 1998 1656 126.6 +51 -6 +31 40.8% -0.83 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.12
28 1999 1620 118.4 +82 -10 35.0% -1.25 1–1 -0.60
29 2000 1609 110.7 +27 +28 45.2% -0.74 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.45
Career 1671 119.2 +26 -68 +39 42.4% -0.43 21–28 (43%) 16–19 (46%) 98.4 +3.40 1868 138.5 +9 -5 -37 49.9% -0.02 67–55 (55%) 38–29 (57%) 106.9 +0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.