H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Olga Barabanschikova vs Samantha Reeves H2H: 1-0
Olga Barabanschikova holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Reeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Olga Barabanschikova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Olga Barabanschikova won the 2000 Bogota fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 46
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2000* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Olga Barabanschikova | 6-3 6-3 | Samantha Reeves | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olga Barabanschikova | #438 | #49 | 520 | 1,669 | 54 | 74 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samantha Reeves | #864 | #62 | 523 | 1,629 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olga Barabanschikova | Samantha Reeves | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #61 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #89 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #111 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #146 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #74 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |