H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Olga Morozova vs Lea Pericoli H2H: 3-1
Olga Morozova holds a 3–1 lead over Lea Pericoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Olga Morozova leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Olga Morozova won the 1971 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 77
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1971* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Olga Morozova | 6-3 6-3 | Lea Pericoli | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1971* | Cairo | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Olga Morozova | 7-5 6-0 | Lea Pericoli | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1970* | Cairo | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Olga Morozova | 6-3 3-6 9-7 | Lea Pericoli | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1969* | Cairo | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Lea Pericoli | 6-1 6-2 | Olga Morozova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olga Morozova | — | — | — | 2,189 | 328 | 108 | 75.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 30 | 38 |
| Lea Pericoli | — | — | — | 1,764 | 58 | 51 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olga Morozova | Lea Pericoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1969 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1970 | 41–9 | 82.0% | — | 1,908 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1971 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,870 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1972 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1973 | 38–11 | 77.6% | — | 2,022 | 0 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1974 | 55–14 | 79.7% | — | 2,166 | 0 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1975 | 41–18 | 69.5% | — | 2,048 | 0 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1976 | 25–10 | 71.4% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1977 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 2,027 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1979 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 2,038 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1980 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 2,039 | 0 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 3 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 3 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 3 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 3 |