H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Olga Morozova vs Sue Barker H2H: 3-2
Olga Morozova holds a 3–2 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Olga Morozova won the 1976 Akron quarterfinal 3-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 77
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1976* | Akron | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Olga Morozova | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Jan 23, 1976* | Landover | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Sue Barker | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | Olga Morozova | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1975* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Olga Morozova | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1975* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Olga Morozova | 6-1 6-0 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Jan 1, 1975* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-2 7-6 | Olga Morozova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olga Morozova | — | — | — | 2,189 | 328 | 108 | 75.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 30 | 38 |
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olga Morozova | Sue Barker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1968 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 |
| 20 | 1969 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 |
| 21 | 1970 | 41–9 | 82.0% | — | 1,908 | 0 | 13 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 |
| 22 | 1971 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,870 | 0 | 17 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 |
| 23 | 1972 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 24 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 |
| 24 | 1973 | 38–11 | 77.6% | — | 2,022 | 0 | 29 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 |
| 25 | 1974 | 55–14 | 79.7% | — | 2,166 | 0 | 33 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 |
| 26 | 1975 | 41–18 | 69.5% | — | 2,048 | 0 | 35 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 |
| 27 | 1976 | 25–10 | 71.4% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 36 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 |
| 28 | 1977 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 2,027 | 0 | 36 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 1979 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 2,038 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1980 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 2,039 | 0 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |