H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

P Frey vs Astrid Etter H2H: 1-0

P Frey holds a 1–0 lead over Astrid Etter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, P Frey leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, P Frey won the 1980 Rumikon round of 32 4-6 6-0 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
P Frey 4-6 6-0 6-3 Astrid Etter Match data Aug 31, 1980* R32 Rumikon WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
P Frey 1,529 3 2 60.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Astrid Etter 1,500 1 3 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

P Frey Astrid Etter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 3–2 60.0% 1,512 0 0 1980 0–2 0.0% 1,468 0 0
1981 1–1 50.0% 1,471 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

P Frey Astrid Etter
Yr Clay Yr Clay
W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 3 2 5 60.0% 1980 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 3 2 5 60.0% Career 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

P Frey Astrid Etter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1513 108.6 +27 58.3% +1.50 1–1 +0.76 1980 1469 95.5 33.3% -2.33 0–2 +0.20
1981 1471 98.9 50.0% -0.50 +0.08
Career 1529 105.2 +27 58.3% +1.50 1–1 +15.20 Career 1500 97.2 40.0% -1.60 0–2 +7.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.