H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-3

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 3–0 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1995 Eastbourne fourth round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Kimiko Date Krumm 7-5 6-2 Pam Shriver #87 Match data
Aug 27, 1992* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Carpet Kimiko Date Krumm 6-3 6-3 Pam Shriver #33 Match data
Jan 21, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-3 Pam Shriver #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 — — — — — — —
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 — — — — — — —
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8