H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Annabel Croft H2H: 0-1

Annabel Croft holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1984 Durban round of 16 6-1 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 6-1 4-6 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Apr 27, 1984* R16 Durban WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Annabel Croft
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,761 0 1
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,574 0 1
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Annabel Croft
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Annabel Croft
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.81
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1589 120.1 — — — — — +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +2.10
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1595 118.1 — — — — -29 — +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.87
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 1984 1615 118.2 — — — — -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1985 1762 133.2 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1986 1653 120.6 — — — — +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1987 1575 108.2 — — — — +47 — -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 — 1780 125.1 — — — — +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.