H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Barbara Potter H2H: 0-2

Barbara Potter holds a 2–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Potter leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1982 Seattle round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Barbara Potter
USA Age 65 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Potter 6-4 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jan 21, 1982* R32 Seattle WTA 250 Carpet
Barbara Potter 6-1 7-6 Pam Teeguarden Match data Nov 26, 1981* R32 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Barbara Potter — #8 63 2,098 303 191 61.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Barbara Potter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1978 4–7 36.4% — 1,532 0 0
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 1979 8–22 26.7% — 1,620 0 0
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1980 27–22 55.1% — 1,875 0 0
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1981 47–23 67.1% #10 1,944 0 0
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1982 43–22 66.2% #8 1,998 0 2
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1983 28–20 58.3% — 1,851 0 2
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1984 35–17 67.3% #12 1,952 0 2
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1985 31–16 66.0% — 1,900 0 3
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1986 14–10 58.3% #26 1,881 0 3
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1987 25–13 65.8% #12 1,899 0 4
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,763 0 3 1988 36–14 72.0% #10 1,919 0 5
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,724 0 3 1989 5–5 50.0% #106 1,845 0 5
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,747 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,803 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,790 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,684 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,652 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,588 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Barbara Potter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1980 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 19 14 33 57.6%
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 12 6 18 66.7% 27 14 41 65.9%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 28 10 38 73.7%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6%
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1984 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 11 4 15 73.3% 17 9 26 65.4%
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1985 12 4 16 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1986 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1988 25 9 34 73.5% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1989 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 89 54 143 62.2% 5 8 13 38.5% 68 39 107 63.6% 141 90 231 61.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Barbara Potter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1533 114.1 — — — — +58 — +55 35.7% -1.14 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.26
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 1979 1621 143.2 — — — — +30 -115 -41 30.3% -0.89 4–6 (40%) 1–8 (11%) 95.5 -1.66
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1980 1876 153.1 — — — — +17 — -301 56.8% +0.53 4–11 (27%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +0.47
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1981 1944 150.6 — — — — -2 — -145 63.1% +0.79 12–7 (63%) 9–10 (47%) 101.6 -1.65
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1982 1999 162.9 — — — — +57 — -127 63.3% +0.89 10–7 (59%) 12–14 (46%) 102.4 -2.52
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.14 1983 1852 139.4 — — — — +53 -246 +13 58.6% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 8–8 (50%) 93.0 +1.63
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.15 1984 1953 157.7 — — — — -8 — -15 67.0% +1.24 3–7 (30%) 8–4 (67%) 94.3 -1.58
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -3.82 1985 1900 142.6 — — — — -7 -288 +63 61.9% +0.74 8–7 (53%) 12–5 (71%) 102.4 +0.02
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +95 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.09 1986 1882 145.3 — — — — +12 — — 56.1% +0.37 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.5 -2.28
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.00 1987 1900 145.8 — — — — +27 — — 64.3% +0.85 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 103.0 +0.37
26 1977 1764 141.6 — — — — -106 -1 +156 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.70 1988 1920 147.3 — — — — +7 — +50 71.4% +1.21 4–8 (33%) 12–3 (80%) 100.4 +2.17
27 1978 1724 122.8 — — — — -146 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.04 1989 1846 116.8 — — — — -9 — — 52.2% -0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.55
28 1979 1748 144.5 — — — — -120 -20 +182 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.5 -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 1803 134.7 — — — — -94 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1790 134.8 — — — — -127 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 1684 118.6 — — — — -147 — +189 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 1653 106.0 — — — — -84 +78 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 1616 107.2 — — — — -38 +69 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 1589 113.4 — — — — -41 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.1 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.83 — 2099 155.7 — — — — +18 -226 -45 60.0% +0.67 66–75 (47%) 81–67 (55%) 98.1 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.