H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 1-4

Betsy Nagelsen holds a 4–1 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Betsy Nagelsen leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1981 Dallas round of 32 3-6 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main-draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 70 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Betsy Nagelsen 3-6 7-6 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data Mar 12, 1981* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Betsy Nagelsen 6-4 7-6 Pam Teeguarden Match data Oct 23, 1980* R32 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Teeguarden 0-6 6-4 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Nov 9, 1978* R32 Oldsmar WTA 250 Hard
Betsy Nagelsen 7-5 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Sep 16, 1976* R32 Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet
Betsy Nagelsen 6-3 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Sep 3, 1974* R32 US Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Betsy Nagelsen — #25 28 1,892 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,707 0 3
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,657 0 3
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,755 0 5
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,808 0 6
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,706 0 6
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,763 0 3 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,693 0 6
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,724 0 3 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,631 0 6
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,747 0 3 1985 14–12 53.8% — 1,714 0 6
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,803 0 3 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,790 0 4 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,646 0 6
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,684 0 4 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,652 0 4 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,588 0 4 1991 0–2 0.0% — 1,608 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 1993 0–4 0.0% — 1,511 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,509 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Betsy Nagelsen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3%
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6%
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — —
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Betsy Nagelsen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.54
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.49
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.24
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1976 1708 124.4 — — — — -64 -115 +73 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.59
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1977 1678 124.1 — — — — -30 -106 +48 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.11
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.14 1978 1658 129.7 — — — — -102 -84 +101 41.2% -0.57 4–11 (27%) 3–7 (30%) 91.9 -1.33
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.15 1979 1695 123.1 — — — — -131 — +13 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.74
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -3.82 1980 1756 131.7 — — — — -144 — +38 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -2.08
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +95 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.09 1981 1809 135.3 — — — — -128 -307 +95 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.62
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.00 1982 1706 123.4 — — — — -98 -215 +169 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 +0.16
26 1977 1764 141.6 — — — — -106 -1 +156 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.70 1983 1693 127.0 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.86
27 1978 1724 122.8 — — — — -146 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.04 1984 1632 126.6 — — — — +58 -142 +116 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.78
28 1979 1748 144.5 — — — — -120 -20 +182 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.5 -1.66 1985 1714 129.7 — — — — -25 — +88 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.14
29 1980 1803 134.7 — — — — -94 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.52 1986 1700 131.2 — — — — -55 — +170 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.52
30 1981 1790 134.8 — — — — -127 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.18 1987 1646 121.7 — — — — -24 — +150 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.59
31 1982 1684 118.6 — — — — -147 — +189 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.24 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -26 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.50
32 1983 1653 106.0 — — — — -84 +78 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.79 1989 1663 126.1 — — — — -56 — +97 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.46
33 1984 1616 107.2 — — — — -38 +69 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.24 1990 1640 115.1 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09
34 1985 1589 113.4 — — — — -41 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -50 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16
Career — 1923 143.1 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.83 — 1893 132.2 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–129 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.0 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.