H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pam Teeguarden vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 1-3
Betty Ann Grubb holds a 3–1 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Betty Ann Grubb leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1980 Toronto second round 6-0 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1980 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Pam Teeguarden | 6-0 1-0 (ret.) | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1970* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Betty Ann Grubb | 4-6 8-6 6-1 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1968* | Ojai | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Betty Ann Grubb | 6-4 6-3 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1968* | Los Angeles Metro | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Betty Ann Grubb | 7-5 6-3 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Teeguarden | — | — | — | 1,926 | 245 | 296 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pam Teeguarden | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1969 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1970 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1971 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 31–25 | 55.4% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| 1973 | 21–22 | 48.8% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| 1974 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 1977 | 14–20 | 41.2% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| 1978 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| 1979 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 1980 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| 1981 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |
| 1982 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |