H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Candy Reynolds H2H: 0-1

Candy Reynolds holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Candy Reynolds leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Candy Reynolds won the 1982 Wimbledon round of 32 5-7 6-3 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Candy Reynolds
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Candy Reynolds 5-7 6-3 8-6 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jun 27, 1982* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Candy Reynolds — #76 5 1,825 85 141 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Candy Reynolds
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,487 0 0
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1975 2–6 25.0% — 1,464 0 0
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,457 0 0
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1977 1–8 11.1% — 1,427 0 0
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1978 2–5 28.6% — 1,429 0 0
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1980 12–13 48.0% — 1,618 0 0
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,763 0 3 1981 19–17 52.8% — 1,786 0 0
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,724 0 3 1982 17–22 43.6% — 1,781 0 0
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,747 0 3 1983 8–13 38.1% — 1,697 0 0
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,803 0 3 1984 6–12 33.3% #109 1,626 0 0
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,790 0 4 1985 6–9 40.0% — 1,606 0 0
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,684 0 4 1986 6–16 27.3% #127 1,547 0 0
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,652 0 4 1987 2–7 22.2% #177 1,492 0 0
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 1988 1–6 14.3% #251 1,440 0 0
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,588 0 4 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,421 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Candy Reynolds
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1977 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1978 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1982 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 1985 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1986 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 28 42 70 40.0% 10 35 45 22.2% 21 33 54 38.9% 23 27 50 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Candy Reynolds
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1973 1498 97.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.46
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1974 1487 97.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 — — — +0.43
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1975 1465 110.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.94 0–2 1–1 — +0.25
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.14 1976 1458 94.8 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 1–0 — +0.04
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.15 1977 1427 98.6 — — — — — +29 — 26.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.63
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -3.82 1978 1430 99.5 — — — — +149 +22 — 28.6% -1.64 — — — +0.50
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +95 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.00 1980 1619 126.0 — — — — +12 — -64 50.0% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 98.3 +0.24
26 1977 1764 141.6 — — — — -106 -1 +156 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.70 1981 1787 143.0 — — — — +13 -230 -171 51.9% +0.07 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.20
27 1978 1724 122.8 — — — — -146 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.04 1982 1781 138.7 — — — — -91 -231 -26 39.8% -0.77 8–3 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.1 -3.46
28 1979 1748 144.5 — — — — -120 -20 +182 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.5 -1.66 1983 1698 121.4 — — — — -14 — — 45.0% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.5 -0.55
29 1980 1803 134.7 — — — — -94 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.52 1984 1627 111.2 — — — — +4 -103 +105 40.5% -0.57 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.02
30 1981 1790 134.8 — — — — -127 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.18 1985 1606 107.9 — — — — +52 — +37 44.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 +1.41
31 1982 1684 118.6 — — — — -147 — +189 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.24 1986 1548 124.2 — — — — +31 -67 +99 35.4% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.65
32 1983 1653 106.0 — — — — -84 +78 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.79 1987 1492 95.3 — — — — +51 -69 — 28.6% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.54
33 1984 1616 107.2 — — — — -38 +69 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.24 1988 1440 91.2 — — — — +52 — — 20.0% -2.47 0–1 1–0 — +0.40
34 1985 1589 113.4 — — — — -41 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 1989 1421 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
Career — 1923 143.1 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.83 — 1825 126.6 — — — — +1 -120 -29 40.7% -0.67 28–37 (43%) 19–22 (46%) 98.6 +0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.