H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 0-1

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1980 Stockholm fourth round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 31, 1980* Stockholm WTA 250 R16 Carpet Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-3 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,926 245 296 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Claudia Kohde Kilsch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,509 0 0 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,506 0 0 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,629 0 1 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,681 0 1 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,874 0 1 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10
22 1973 21–22 48.8% — 1,846 0 1 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,905 0 3 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,815 0 3 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,775 0 3 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,783 0 3 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,740 0 3 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,748 0 3 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,803 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,788 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,684 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,653 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,616 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,588 0 4 — — — — — — —