H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Etsuko Inoue H2H: 0-1

Etsuko Inoue holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Etsuko Inoue leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Etsuko Inoue won the 1984 US Open round of 128 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Etsuko Inoue
JPN Age 61 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Etsuko Inoue #58 6-2 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data Aug 30, 1984* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Etsuko Inoue #310 #26 27 1,803 120 133 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Etsuko Inoue
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 1982 3–2 60.0% — 1,523 0 0
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1983 17–15 53.1% — 1,641 0 1
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1984 19–19 50.0% #68 1,699 0 2
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1985 13–21 38.2% #70 1,633 0 2
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1986 9–14 39.1% #80 1,635 0 2
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1987 20–15 57.1% #30 1,764 0 2
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1988 11–14 44.0% #52 1,703 0 2
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1989 15–18 45.5% #68 1,669 0 2
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1990 13–13 50.0% #70 1,661 0 2
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Etsuko Inoue
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1982 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 5 9 14 35.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1987 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 9 6 15 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1988 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1989 11 14 25 44.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 57 67 124 46.0% 14 18 32 43.8% 35 34 69 50.7% 9 13 22 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Etsuko Inoue
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1488 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1483 100.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.02
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 1982 1523 98.7 — — — — +58 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 0–1 — +0.31
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1983 1642 120.1 — — — — +5 -38 -81 52.9% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +1.48
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1984 1700 134.3 — — — — -9 -31 -114 50.6% +0.12 5–6 (45%) 3–5 (38%) 98.1 +0.10
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1985 1633 117.6 — — — — -18 +12 -71 41.3% -0.66 5–7 (42%) 2–2 (50%) 96.4 +0.47
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18 1986 1636 124.5 — — — — -97 — +70 42.6% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -0.52
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 1987 1765 138.1 — — — — -109 — +24 59.0% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 +0.20
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34 1988 1703 132.8 — — — — -74 — +78 48.4% -0.06 4–8 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 97.7 -0.96
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 1989 1670 137.7 — — — — -24 — +87 47.4% -0.14 4–8 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 96.6 -0.43
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53 1990 1661 128.5 — — — — +23 — +100 49.2% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 5–1 (83%) 104.2 -0.07
26 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 — 1803 134.7 — — — — -33 -20 +14 49.1% -0.11 32–49 (40%) 25–17 (60%) 99.0 +0.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.