H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Heidi Eisterlehner H2H: 2-0

Pam Teeguarden holds a 2–0 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Teeguarden leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1981 Houston round of 16 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Heidi Eisterlehner
GER Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Teeguarden 6-1 6-3 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data Feb 20, 1981* R16 Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Teeguarden 6-1 6-4 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data Jun 4, 1978* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Heidi Eisterlehner — — — 1,769 114 130 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Heidi Eisterlehner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,507 0 0
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1972 0–5 0.0% — 1,438 0 0
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1973 5–6 45.5% — 1,466 0 0
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1974 2–2 50.0% — 1,482 0 0
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1975 13–9 59.1% — 1,666 0 2
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,763 0 3 1976 15–19 44.1% — 1,653 0 2
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,724 0 3 1977 11–15 42.3% — 1,612 0 2
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,747 0 3 1978 14–16 46.7% — 1,605 0 2
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,803 0 3 1979 4–6 40.0% — 1,594 0 2
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,790 0 4 1980 27–18 60.0% — 1,706 0 3
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,684 0 4 1981 7–12 36.8% — 1,636 0 3
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,652 0 4 1982 10–12 45.5% — 1,548 0 3
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 1983 1–2 33.3% — 1,552 0 3
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,588 0 4 1984 2–4 33.3% — 1,536 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Heidi Eisterlehner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1969 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1970 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1972 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1973 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1975 — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — —
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7%
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1981 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — — — — —
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 8 10 18 44.4% 72 73 145 49.7% 9 25 34 26.5% 23 19 42 54.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Heidi Eisterlehner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1969 1486 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.13
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1970 1508 100.6 — — — — — +43 — 50.0% -0.92 — — — +0.52
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.15 1972 1439 91.1 — — — — — +19 — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.82
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -3.82 1973 1466 102.3 — — — — — +30 — 44.0% -0.56 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.68
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +95 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.09 1974 1483 100.4 — — — — — +33 — 40.0% -1.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.79
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.00 1975 1667 123.4 — — — — — +28 -100 56.6% +0.36 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 +0.81
26 1977 1764 141.6 — — — — -106 -1 +156 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.70 1976 1653 123.0 — — — — -39 +22 -101 47.4% -0.24 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 105.0 +0.87
27 1978 1724 122.8 — — — — -146 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.04 1977 1612 114.1 — — — — — +52 -147 38.6% -0.90 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 102.1 +0.82
28 1979 1748 144.5 — — — — -120 -20 +182 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.5 -1.66 1978 1605 119.3 — — — — +79 +51 -122 49.3% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 +2.70
29 1980 1803 134.7 — — — — -94 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.52 1979 1594 107.1 — — — — +95 — — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 +1.59
30 1981 1790 134.8 — — — — -127 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.18 1980 1707 133.4 — — — — +7 +67 — 62.6% +0.85 5–8 (38%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 +1.99
31 1982 1684 118.6 — — — — -147 — +189 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.24 1981 1637 110.6 — — — — +67 +56 — 42.2% -0.47 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +2.47
32 1983 1653 106.0 — — — — -84 +78 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.79 1982 1548 102.2 — — — — +97 +36 — 45.5% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +2.18
33 1984 1616 107.2 — — — — -38 +69 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.24 1983 1553 103.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — +0.35
34 1985 1589 113.4 — — — — -41 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 1984 1536 106.9 — — — — +81 — — 35.7% -1.29 1–1 — — +0.33
Career — 1923 143.1 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.83 — 1769 120.8 — — — — +49 +43 -114 47.9% -0.29 38–42 (48%) 23–21 (52%) 99.5 +7.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.