H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Iris Riedel Kuhn H2H: 0-2

Iris Riedel Kuhn holds a 2–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iris Riedel Kuhn leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Iris Riedel Kuhn won the 1977 Indianapolis round of 16 3-6 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Iris Riedel Kuhn
FRG Age 72

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Iris Riedel Kuhn 3-6 6-2 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Aug 13, 1977* R16 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Iris Riedel Kuhn 6-3 7-6 Pam Teeguarden Match data May 23, 1975* R16 Hamburg Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Iris Riedel Kuhn — — — 1,845 104 96 52.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Iris Riedel Kuhn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1972 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1974 2–4 33.3% — 1,490 0 0
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1975 16–13 55.2% — 1,684 0 0
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1976 10–15 40.0% — 1,679 0 0
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1977 13–14 48.1% — 1,706 0 0
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1978 13–10 56.5% — 1,694 0 1
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1979 5–9 35.7% — 1,685 0 1
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3 1980 28–9 75.7% — 1,820 0 4
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3 1981 15–13 53.6% — 1,730 0 7
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3 1982 1–6 14.3% — 1,627 0 7
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Iris Riedel Kuhn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1974 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1975 — — — — 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1978 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1980 — — — — 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1981 — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1982 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 1 5 6 16.7% 81 62 143 56.6% 3 8 11 27.3% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Iris Riedel Kuhn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1972 1485 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 — 1–0 — +0.37
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1973 1479 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.12
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1974 1491 113.8 — — — — — +14 — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — +0.12
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18 1975 1685 137.0 — — — — -42 +13 — 53.7% +0.22 7–6 (54%) 5–3 (63%) 104.4 -0.17
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 1976 1680 125.4 — — — — -69 +22 — 41.4% -0.64 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — -0.74
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34 1977 1706 135.3 — — — — -154 +71 — 48.4% -0.23 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.3 -1.31
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 1978 1694 124.7 — — — — -99 -10 -173 58.5% +0.91 2–5 (29%) 1–1 — +2.71
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53 1979 1685 123.5 — — — — — +33 — 41.9% -1.35 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — -1.31
26 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 1980 1820 140.6 — — — — — +136 — 72.7% +1.95 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 99.3 +1.28
27 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 1981 1730 122.0 — — — — — +227 — 51.7% -0.26 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 103.5 -0.12
28 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 1982 1627 97.1 — — — — — +128 — 29.4% -1.12 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.33
29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 — 1845 136.1 — — — — -86 +85 -173 52.5% +0.14 28–32 (47%) 14–11 (56%) 99.6 +0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.