H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Laura Dupont H2H: 2-1

Pam Teeguarden holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Dupont in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pam Teeguarden leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1981 Wimbledon round of 64 6-3 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Laura Dupont
USA Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Teeguarden 6-3 3-6 6-4 Laura Dupont Match data Jun 26, 1981* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Laura Dupont 7-6 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jul 31, 1980* R32 San Diego WTA 500 Hard
Pam Teeguarden 6-0 4-6 6-3 Laura Dupont Match data Sep 13, 1973* R32 St. Louis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Laura Dupont — — — 1,895 216 244 47.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Laura Dupont
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1968 6–11 35.3% — 1,495 0 0
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1969 2–4 33.3% — 1,494 0 0
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1970 10–7 58.8% — 1,580 0 1
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1971 12–8 60.0% — 1,684 0 1
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1972 7–14 33.3% — 1,647 0 1
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1973 13–23 36.1% — 1,642 0 1
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1974 15–17 46.9% — 1,718 0 1
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3 1975 23–22 51.1% — 1,768 0 2
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3 1976 25–19 56.8% — 1,820 0 3
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3 1977 28–22 56.0% — 1,839 0 5
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3 1978 24–25 49.0% — 1,730 0 5
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4 1979 22–20 52.4% — 1,816 0 6
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4 1980 16–23 41.0% — 1,717 0 6
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4 1981 7–16 30.4% — 1,638 0 6
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 1982 6–12 33.3% — 1,593 0 6
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,591 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Laura Dupont
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1968 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1969 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1970 — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1971 — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0%
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1975 4 6 10 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1976 6 2 8 75.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1978 10 8 18 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 7 8 12.5%
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 1979 14 7 21 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 7 11 18 38.9%
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1981 4 4 8 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 57 52 109 52.3% 88 84 172 51.2% 39 54 93 41.9% 26 52 78 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Laura Dupont
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1968 1496 96.8 — — — — — -40 +22 34.3% -1.34 1–0 — — -0.66
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1969 1494 102.2 — — — — — -26 — 42.9% -0.86 0–2 — — +0.11
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18 1970 1580 121.7 — — — — — +26 -62 52.5% +0.37 5–1 (83%) — — +0.70
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 1971 1685 124.2 — — — — — -44 -54 57.8% +0.69 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 +1.40
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34 1972 1648 121.6 — — — — -106 -34 -46 40.8% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -1.41
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 1973 1643 133.5 — — — — -87 +25 -74 38.8% -0.88 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -2.68
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53 1974 1719 132.6 — — — — -45 -78 -83 47.6% -0.24 3–2 (60%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.83
26 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 1975 1768 135.9 — — — — -32 -30 -179 50.0% -0.14 10–8 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.5 -2.55
27 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 1976 1821 131.2 — — — — -34 -72 -180 55.9% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 0.00
28 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 1977 1839 143.1 — — — — -96 +86 -292 53.3% +0.30 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 103.4 -2.78
29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 1978 1730 130.7 — — — — -24 +52 -49 50.4% -0.03 8–13 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 94.1 +1.75
30 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 1979 1816 142.5 — — — — -23 -30 -119 47.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) 106.3 -0.40
31 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19 1980 1718 128.9 — — — — -37 +25 — 40.0% -1.02 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -2.83
32 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80 1981 1638 117.4 — — — — +57 +8 +67 35.7% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 -0.31
33 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32 1982 1593 108.3 — — — — +94 -39 +49 37.8% -0.78 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 -0.10
34 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53 1983 1592 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.31
Career — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 — 1895 136.1 — — — — -33 -4 -72 46.9% -0.27 84–80 (51%) 48–38 (56%) 104.0 -2.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.