H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Marcie Louie H2H: 2-1

Pam Teeguarden holds a 2–1 lead over Marcie Louie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcie Louie leads 1–0 on carpet, while Pam Teeguarden leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1977 São Paulo Open round of 32 3-6 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Marcie Louie
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Teeguarden 3-6 7-5 6-1 Marcie Louie Match data Oct 20, 1977* R32 São Paulo Open WTA 250 Hard
Marcie Louie 6-3 5-7 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data Feb 21, 1976* R16 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Teeguarden 6-4 5-7 6-3 Marcie Louie Match data Aug 22, 1975* R32 Westchester WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Marcie Louie — — — 1,865 103 141 42.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Marcie Louie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,491 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1969 4–1 80.0% — 1,545 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,564 0 2
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 1971 4–3 57.1% — 1,593 0 3
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1972 19–20 48.7% — 1,699 0 3
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1973 7–20 25.9% — 1,626 0 3
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1974 11–17 39.3% — 1,684 0 3
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1975 16–15 51.6% — 1,784 0 4
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1976 13–16 44.8% — 1,787 0 4
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1977 11–22 33.3% — 1,649 0 4
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1978 0–2 0.0% — 1,601 0 4
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1979 2–5 28.6% — 1,609 0 4
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3 1980 10–10 50.0% — 1,609 0 4
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,609 0 4
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,576 0 4
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Marcie Louie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1971 2 0 2 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1972 1 4 5 20.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1974 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0%
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1977 3 5 8 37.5% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 5 8 13 38.5%
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1980 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 28 41 69 40.6% 32 35 67 47.8% 13 18 31 41.9% 26 44 70 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Marcie Louie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1492 100.8 — — — — +9 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.04
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1545 108.9 — — — — +74 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 — — +0.89
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1565 106.0 — — — — +51 — — 46.2% +0.08 1–0 1–1 — +0.63
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 1971 1593 107.1 — — — — — — -48 50.0% -0.42 — — — +1.18
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1972 1699 128.6 — — — — -98 -107 +10 47.1% -0.29 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 103.2 -3.23
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1973 1627 126.7 — — — — -36 -91 — 24.6% -1.54 3–2 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 100.9 -3.41
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1974 1684 131.0 — — — — -38 -120 — 40.0% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 105.8 -1.83
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18 1975 1784 141.4 — — — — -69 -51 — 49.3% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 6–1 (86%) 106.0 -1.61
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 1976 1788 133.0 — — — — -63 -23 -148 45.2% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 2–7 (22%) 101.6 -2.81
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34 1977 1649 127.8 — — — — +26 +9 — 35.1% -1.01 6–5 (55%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 -0.50
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 1978 1602 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.67
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53 1979 1610 120.6 — — — — +45 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 — — -0.60
26 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 1980 1609 110.6 — — — — +2 +54 — 47.7% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.67
27 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 1981 1609 104.8 — — — — +37 — — 36.4% -1.27 1–0 2–0 — +0.25
28 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 1982 1576 93.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12
29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 — 1866 133.0 — — — — -23 -46 -24 41.3% -0.61 36–23 (61%) 22–23 (49%) 108.5 -3.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.