H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pam Teeguarden vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 1-0
Pam Teeguarden holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Teeguarden leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1981 Sydney second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 1981* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Pam Teeguarden | 6-2 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Teeguarden | — | — | — | 1,926 | 245 | 296 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pam Teeguarden | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 1972 | 31–25 | 55.4% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 1973 | 21–22 | 48.8% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1974 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1976 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 14–20 | 41.2% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1978 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |