H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Pam Teeguarden vs Mary Mclean H2H: 1-0
Pam Teeguarden holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Mclean in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Teeguarden leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1972 St. Petersburg third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1972* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Pam Teeguarden | 6-0 6-0 | Mary Mclean | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Teeguarden | — | — | — | 1,926 | 245 | 296 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mary Mclean | — | — | — | 1,508 | 19 | 42 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pam Teeguarden | Mary Mclean | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,405 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,360 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 31–25 | 55.4% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,345 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 21–22 | 48.8% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 14–20 | 41.2% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |