H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 0-2

Mima Jausovec holds a 2–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1977 Roland Garros quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.

USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 7-5 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jun 2, 1977* QF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Mima Jausovec 3-6 6-1 11-9 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jun 27, 1975* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% 1,533 0 1
16 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,560 0 1
17 1968 12–17 41.4% 1,488 0 0 1974 18–13 58.1% 1,793 0 1
18 1969 5–11 31.2% 1,493 0 0 1975 16–19 45.7% 1,833 0 1
19 1970 19–19 50.0% 1,612 0 1 1976 33–16 67.3% 2,004 0 4
20 1971 17–21 44.7% 1,679 0 1 1977 32–21 60.4% 2,010 1 5
21 1972 31–25 55.4% 1,868 0 1 1978 29–19 60.4% 1,947 1 6
22 1973 22–23 48.9% 1,839 0 1 1979 32–28 53.3% 1,870 1 6
23 1974 22–18 55.0% 1,901 0 3 1980 34–22 60.7% 1,945 1 6
24 1975 21–25 45.7% 1,816 0 3 1981 57–28 67.1% 2,013 1 6
25 1976 7–14 33.3% 1,779 0 3 1982 36–24 60.0% 1,857 1 7
26 1977 14–20 41.2% 1,762 0 3 1983 23–16 59.0% 1,873 1 7
27 1978 11–19 36.7% 1,723 0 3 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 1979 13–19 40.6% 1,746 0 3 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 1980 17–16 51.5% 1,802 0 3 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 1981 20–19 51.3% 1,789 0 4 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 1982 3–10 23.1% 1,682 0 4 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7
32 1983 4–6 40.0% 1,651 0 4
33 1984 8–11 42.1% 1,615 0 4
34 1985 0–4 0.0% 1,587 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 2 0 2 100.0%
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 100.0% +3.75 +0.55
16 1973 1561 114.8 +38 57.1% +1.57 1–0 +0.21
17 1968 1489 104.8 +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) -0.27 1974 1794 144.8 -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90
18 1969 1494 104.2 -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) -0.40 1975 1833 146.7 -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97
19 1970 1613 133.6 +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 -0.45 1976 2004 156.6 -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78
20 1971 1679 136.1 +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 -0.97 1977 2011 161.6 -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51
21 1972 1868 151.0 -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 -7.18 1978 1947 147.6 -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80
22 1973 1839 149.0 -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 1979 1871 146.4 -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84
23 1974 1902 145.5 -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) -4.34 1980 1945 155.9 +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63
24 1975 1817 144.3 -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 1981 2013 157.1 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76
25 1976 1779 135.2 -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) -3.53 1982 1858 148.5 +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56
26 1977 1763 141.5 -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 1983 1874 143.9 -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67
27 1978 1724 122.7 -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 1984 1748 131.7 -27 +199 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31
28 1979 1746 144.0 -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 1985 1695 127.6 -21 +205 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67
29 1980 1802 134.4 -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 1986 1673 105.7 +197 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.18
30 1981 1789 134.6 -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 1987 1656 107.2 +179 40.0% -1.60 0–2 -0.33
31 1982 1683 118.4 -148 +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 +0.19 1988 1641 110.1 +162 25.0% -2.75 -0.77
32 1983 1652 106.0 -83 +79 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80
33 1984 1615 107.2 -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32
34 1985 1588 113.3 -40 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 -0.53
Career 1923 143.0 -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 2091 156.0 -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.