H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Nancy Richey H2H: 1-6

Nancy Richey holds a 6–1 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 3–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1978 Hollywood round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main-draw meetings
Nancy Richey
USA Age 84 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nancy Richey 6-2 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jan 13, 1978* R16 Hollywood WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Teeguarden 7-5 4-6 6-3 Nancy Richey Match data May 31, 1977* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Nancy Richey 6-4 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Mar 23, 1974* SF Akron WTA 250 Carpet
Nancy Richey 4-6 7-5 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Sep 1, 1973* R64 US Open Grand Slam Grass
Nancy Richey 5-7 6-1 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data May 13, 1973* R16 Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Carpet
Nancy Richey 6-3 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Apr 15, 1972* R16 St. Petersburg WTA 500 Clay
Nancy Richey 6-2 7-6 Pam Teeguarden Match data Oct 2, 1971* R16 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nancy Richey — #8 — 2,245 324 109 74.8% 1 0 0 2 19 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Nancy Richey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1968 56–5 91.8% — 1,916 1 4
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3 1969 33–8 80.5% — 2,054 1 7
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3 1970 43–8 84.3% — 2,122 1 14
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3 1971 29–13 69.0% — 2,076 1 14
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3 1972 45–12 78.9% — 2,194 1 19
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4 1973 34–13 72.3% — 2,191 1 19
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4 1974 25–13 65.8% — 2,151 1 19
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4 1975 24–11 68.6% #8 2,120 1 20
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 1976 14–10 58.3% — 2,084 1 20
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4 1977 15–7 68.2% — 2,016 1 22
35 — — — — — — — 1978 6–9 40.0% — 1,922 1 22

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Nancy Richey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1968 5 1 6 83.3% 35 3 38 92.1% 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1969 15 4 19 78.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1970 9 0 9 100.0% 26 5 31 83.9% 4 1 5 80.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1971 8 4 12 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 5 13 61.5%
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1972 11 1 12 91.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 13 3 16 81.3%
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 1973 12 3 15 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1974 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1975 11 3 14 78.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6%
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5%
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 87 29 116 75.0% 125 34 159 78.6% 38 11 49 77.6% 65 35 100 65.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Nancy Richey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53 1968 1916 145.6 — — — — -119 +83 -174 87.6% +3.09 10–1 (91%) — — -0.10
26 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 1969 2054 151.8 — — — — +32 -32 -127 77.3% +1.99 6–2 (75%) — — -3.41
27 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 1970 2123 162.9 — — — — +60 -35 -127 80.0% +2.51 6–2 (75%) 1–0 — -4.02
28 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 1971 2077 156.0 — — — — +22 +31 -94 65.1% +1.50 4–4 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.6 -3.59
29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 1972 2194 166.6 — — — — +186 -41 -224 79.6% +2.43 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.6 -6.67
30 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 1973 2192 164.0 — — — — +123 -6 -220 67.6% +1.24 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.3 -7.33
31 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19 1974 2152 156.5 — — — — +112 +19 -165 68.9% +1.60 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 99.8 -3.90
32 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80 1975 2121 155.3 — — — — +105 -19 — 65.8% +1.55 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 96.2 -2.17
33 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32 1976 2085 155.1 — — — — +132 -40 — 60.0% +0.82 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -4.18
34 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53 1977 2016 146.8 — — — — +91 +43 — 64.6% +1.42 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 -1.27
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1923 136.5 — — — — +56 +55 — 45.5% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -2.03
Career — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 — 2245 164.5 — — — — +89 +9 -154 72.7% +1.89 62–37 (63%) 26–26 (50%) 100.3 -9.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.