H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Natasha Chmyreva H2H: 0-2

Natasha Chmyreva holds a 2–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natasha Chmyreva leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Chmyreva won the 1977 Seattle round of 16 7-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Natasha Chmyreva
URS Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Natasha Chmyreva 7-6 6-0 Pam Teeguarden Match data Feb 4, 1977* R16 Seattle WTA 250 Carpet
Natasha Chmyreva 7-5 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Mar 18, 1976* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Natasha Chmyreva — — — 1,982 58 39 59.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Natasha Chmyreva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,465 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1974 5–3 62.5% — 1,542 0 1
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 1975 26–13 66.7% — 1,822 0 2
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1976 18–13 58.1% — 1,932 0 2
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1977 7–5 58.3% — 1,965 0 2
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1978 1–0 100.0% — 1,970 0 3
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,949 0 3
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Natasha Chmyreva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3%
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 7 5 12 58.3%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 20 9 29 69.0% 17 19 36 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Natasha Chmyreva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1486 87.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.28
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1466 97.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.13 — — — +0.65
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1543 124.3 — — — — — -6 — 62.5% +0.94 — — — +0.70
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 1975 1823 146.4 — — — — -163 -222 -54 61.1% +0.82 11–6 (65%) 3–2 (60%) 109.4 -0.66
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1976 1932 157.3 — — — — -129 -218 -111 59.4% +0.62 4–5 (44%) 0–1 — -3.66
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1977 1965 136.7 — — — — -83 — — 60.0% +0.60 2–0 3–2 (60%) — -1.51
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1978 1970 102.5 — — — — — — — 66.7% -0.33 1–0 — — +0.12
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18 1979 1949 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.05
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 — 1982 149.0 — — — — -122 -174 -75 58.1% +0.53 18–11 (62%) 6–5 (55%) 111.4 -4.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.