H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Pam Teeguarden holds a 1–0 lead over Obrien in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1981 Los Angeles Sectional quarterfinal 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Teeguarden | 6-2 6-0 | Obrien | Match data | Sep 17, 1981* | QF | Los Angeles Sectional | WTA 250 | — |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Teeguarden | — | — | — | 1,922 | 246 | 297 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Obrien | — | — | — | 1,528 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pam Teeguarden | Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1972 | 31–25 | 55.4% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,901 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 14–20 | 41.2% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,802 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Pam Teeguarden | Obrien | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1968 | 1489 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -5 | +11 | 45.0% | -0.33 | 1–5 (17%) | — | — | -0.27 | 1978 | 1482 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +0.10 |
| 1969 | 1494 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -42 | +25 | 36.1% | -1.11 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | -0.40 | 1981 | 1494 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.17 |
| 1970 | 1613 | 133.6 | — | — | — | — | +18 | -130 | -29 | 52.9% | +0.58 | 2–9 (18%) | 0–1 | — | -0.45 | 1982 | 1515 | 103.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 66.7% | +0.67 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 1971 | 1679 | 136.1 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -80 | -95 | 47.1% | +0.06 | 3–6 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1972 | 1868 | 151.0 | — | — | — | — | -247 | -107 | -5 | 55.4% | +0.26 | 4–9 (31%) | 1–1 | — | -7.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 1839 | 149.0 | — | — | — | — | -139 | -96 | +71 | 50.5% | -0.06 | 6–9 (40%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.2 | -9.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 1902 | 145.5 | — | — | — | — | -77 | -170 | +7 | 52.8% | +0.33 | 6–3 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -4.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 1817 | 144.3 | — | — | — | — | -102 | +1 | +94 | 46.8% | -0.11 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.4 | -4.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 1779 | 135.2 | — | — | — | — | -111 | -7 | +168 | 38.0% | -1.00 | 3–5 (38%) | — | — | -3.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 1763 | 141.5 | — | — | — | — | -105 | 0 | +158 | 41.4% | -0.63 | 3–3 (50%) | 4–7 (36%) | 98.3 | -3.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 1724 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | -143 | -12 | +180 | 36.8% | -0.90 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | 97.4 | -2.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 1746 | 144.0 | — | — | — | — | -120 | -19 | +184 | 42.7% | -0.37 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–7 (36%) | 99.3 | -1.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 1802 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | -98 | -69 | +93 | 48.1% | -0.16 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.0 | -1.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 1789 | 134.6 | — | — | — | — | -128 | -12 | +88 | 52.2% | +0.34 | 6–8 (43%) | 3–4 (43%) | 97.5 | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 1683 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | -148 | — | +191 | 31.3% | -1.16 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1652 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | -83 | +79 | — | 45.8% | -0.13 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.0 | +0.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 1615 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | -38 | +70 | +200 | 40.9% | -0.93 | 4–2 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | 105.0 | +1.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1588 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | -40 | — | — | 11.1% | -2.78 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1923 | 143.0 | — | — | — | — | -97 | -51 | +59 | 46.5% | -0.19 | 67–96 (41%) | 36–49 (42%) | 93.3 | -6.98 | Career | 1528 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 54.5% | -0.09 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.67 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Wade | 0 | 16 | 16 | Sep 3, 1981 | H2H |
| Rosie Casals | 2 | 14 | 16 | Mar 26, 1980 | H2H |
| Kerry Reid | 0 | 16 | 16 | Nov 8, 1979 | H2H |
| Billie Jean King | 1 | 9 | 10 | Nov 23, 1979 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 2 | 7 | 9 | May 29, 1985 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phyllis Blackwell | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 7, 1982 | H2H |
| Joy Cummings | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 7, 1982 | H2H |
| Jamie Golder | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 6, 1982 | H2H |
| Pam Teeguarden | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 17, 1981 | H2H |
| Cheryl Jones | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 16, 1981 | H2H |