H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 1-2

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 2–1 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 2–0 on grass, while Pam Teeguarden leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1984 Newport fourth round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 3, 1984* Newport WTA 250 R16 Grass Rosalyn Fairbank #36 6-1 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Jun 11, 1982* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Rosalyn Fairbank 2-6 6-0 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Feb 26, 1981* Seattle WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Teeguarden 6-4 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,926 245 296 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,509 0 0 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,506 0 0 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,629 0 1 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,681 0 1 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,874 0 1 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0
22 1973 21–22 48.8% — 1,846 0 1 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,905 0 3 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,815 0 3 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,775 0 3 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,783 0 3 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,740 0 3 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,748 0 3 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,803 0 3 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,788 0 4 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,684 0 4 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,653 0 4 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,616 0 4 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,588 0 4 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1