H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Virginia Ruzici H2H: 0-7

Virginia Ruzici holds a 7–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1981 Roland Garros round of 16 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 7
7 main-draw meetings
Virginia Ruzici
ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruzici 6-3 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jun 2, 1981* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Virginia Ruzici 6-3 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Nov 8, 1980* QF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet
Virginia Ruzici 6-3 5-7 7-5 Pam Teeguarden Match data Sep 13, 1980* QF Salt Lake City WTA 250 Hard
Virginia Ruzici 6-2 2-6 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Sep 1, 1980* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Virginia Ruzici 6-4 7-5 Pam Teeguarden Match data Aug 13, 1980* R32 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Virginia Ruzici 6-3 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Aug 23, 1979* R32 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Virginia Ruzici 6-2 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data May 18, 1979* R16 Vienna WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Virginia Ruzici #264 #16 5 2,123 455 274 62.4% 1 0 0 1 17 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Virginia Ruzici
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,493 0 0
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,647 0 2
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,686 0 3
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,797 0 3
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,919 0 4
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,092 1 8
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,974 1 8
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,031 1 12
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3 1981 58–30 65.9% — 1,919 1 13
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,983 1 17
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,905 1 18
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,780 1 18
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4 1985 27–19 58.7% #48 1,786 1 19
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4 1986 0–2 0.0% #185 1,734 1 19
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,657 1 19
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Virginia Ruzici
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1973 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1976 — — — — 28 12 40 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5%
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1978 14 9 23 60.9% 19 4 23 82.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 11 27 59.3%
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 15 9 24 62.5%
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1980 14 5 19 73.7% 27 5 32 84.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 24 11 35 68.6%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 27 8 35 77.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 16 13 29 55.2%
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1982 10 5 15 66.7% 24 5 29 82.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1984 2 6 8 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7%
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 1985 7 6 13 53.8% 17 6 23 73.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 69 55 124 55.6% 218 85 303 71.9% 43 34 77 55.8% 114 96 210 54.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Virginia Ruzici
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 1972 1484 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1973 1494 102.8 — — — — +96 -24 — 33.3% -1.19 0–1 0–1 — +0.98
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1974 1647 134.9 — — — — -93 +57 -167 56.8% +0.64 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 102.5 +1.04
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1975 1686 122.9 — — — — — +81 — 51.6% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.38
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18 1976 1797 142.1 — — — — -255 +110 -321 58.1% +0.62 9–8 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 100.1 -1.76
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 1977 1920 148.2 — — — — -145 +43 — 50.0% +0.01 11–3 (79%) 1–0 — -5.12
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34 1978 2092 158.8 — — — — -38 -54 -463 66.3% +1.06 14–6 (70%) 14–6 (70%) 111.1 -7.09
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 1979 1975 151.3 — — — — +50 +39 -193 63.7% +0.92 15–10 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -3.12
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53 1980 2032 157.7 — — — — +31 +158 -224 69.9% +1.37 14–9 (61%) 10–7 (59%) 101.1 -5.80
26 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 1981 1919 158.9 — — — — -19 +290 -67 62.6% +0.85 13–7 (65%) 9–6 (60%) 102.2 -6.70
27 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 1982 1984 156.4 — — — — -61 +260 -118 68.6% +1.30 9–11 (45%) 11–6 (65%) 98.3 -4.11
28 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 1983 1905 143.8 — — — — +21 +136 -21 60.4% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +2.73
29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 1984 1781 144.3 — — — — -45 +178 — 51.0% +0.29 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 87.0 -0.89
30 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 1985 1786 140.6 — — — — -87 +216 +68 57.4% +0.63 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.16
31 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19 1986 1735 90.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.44
32 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80 1987 1658 111.9 — — — — — +211 — 46.4% -0.14 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.99
33 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 — 2123 154.7 — — — — -27 +141 -197 61.0% +0.79 108–81 (57%) 70–52 (57%) 104.0 -3.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.