H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Virginia Ruzici H2H: 0-7

Virginia Ruzici holds a 7–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1981 Roland Garros fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 7
7 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruzici
ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 2, 1981* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Virginia Ruzici 6-3 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Nov 8, 1980* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Carpet Virginia Ruzici 6-3 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Sep 13, 1980* Salt Lake City WTA 250 QF Hard Virginia Ruzici 6-3 5-7 7-5 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Sep 1, 1980* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Virginia Ruzici 6-2 2-6 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Aug 10, 1980 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Virginia Ruzici 6-4 7-5 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Aug 23, 1979* Mahwah WTA 250 R32 Hard Virginia Ruzici 6-3 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data
May 18, 1979* Vienna WTA 250 R16 Clay Virginia Ruzici 6-2 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,926 245 296 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Virginia Ruzici #264 #16 5 2,121 458 274 62.6% 1 0 0 1 18 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Virginia Ruzici
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,509 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,506 0 0 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,494 0 0
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,629 0 1 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,651 0 2
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,681 0 1 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,687 0 3
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,874 0 1 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,796 0 3
22 1973 21–22 48.8% — 1,846 0 1 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,918 0 4
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,905 0 3 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,093 1 8
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,815 0 3 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,966 1 8
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,775 0 3 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,027 1 12
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,783 0 3 1981 61–30 67.0% — 1,920 1 14
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,740 0 3 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,982 1 18
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,748 0 3 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,905 1 19
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,803 0 3 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,780 1 19
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,788 0 4 1985 27–19 58.7% #48 1,786 1 20
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,684 0 4 1986 0–2 0.0% #185 1,734 1 20
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,653 0 4 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,658 1 20
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,616 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,588 0 4 — — — — — — —