H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Wendy White H2H: 1-2

Wendy White holds a 2–1 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Wendy White leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wendy White won the 1983 Roland Garros round of 64 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Wendy White
USA Age 65 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wendy White 6-2 7-6 Pam Teeguarden Match data May 26, 1983* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Wendy White 5-7 7-5 7-6 Pam Teeguarden Match data Oct 15, 1981* R32 Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Pam Teeguarden 7-6 7-5 Wendy White Match data May 28, 1981* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Wendy White #567 #28 24 1,856 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Wendy White
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 1978 0–2 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,554 0 0
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1980 15–13 53.6% — 1,729 0 0
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1981 16–16 50.0% — 1,767 0 0
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1982 20–20 50.0% — 1,760 0 0
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1983 25–21 54.3% — 1,816 0 0
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1984 13–18 41.9% #67 1,717 0 0
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1985 8–16 33.3% #75 1,607 0 0
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1986 22–19 53.7% #45 1,701 0 1
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3 1987 17–17 50.0% #34 1,732 0 1
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3 1988 10–16 38.5% #66 1,671 0 1
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3 1989 9–16 36.0% #102 1,614 0 1
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3 1990 3–9 25.0% #154 1,566 0 1
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4 1992 0–1 0.0% #567 1,552 0 1
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Wendy White
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1982 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1983 9 7 16 56.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1985 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1986 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1988 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1990 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 61 78 139 43.9% 17 26 43 39.5% 43 43 86 50.0% 40 42 82 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Wendy White
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 1978 1491 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.08
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1979 1554 130.3 — — — — +71 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 — — -0.40
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1980 1730 140.3 — — — — -12 — -101 53.1% +0.36 4–4 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.2 -1.19
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1981 1767 130.7 — — — — +7 -203 -117 49.3% +0.14 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 103.2 -1.36
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18 1982 1761 136.1 — — — — +8 — -121 47.1% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–6 (33%) 99.0 -1.25
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 1983 1817 144.2 — — — — +14 -121 -154 50.0% -0.02 11–5 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 106.1 -3.83
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34 1984 1718 135.1 — — — — -9 -48 +26 44.3% -0.23 3–5 (38%) 4–6 (40%) 97.1 -1.52
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 1985 1608 111.7 — — — — +8 — +122 34.5% -1.05 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 +1.08
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53 1986 1702 130.2 — — — — +2 -87 +29 52.0% +0.27 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 101.2 +1.66
26 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 1987 1732 131.9 — — — — -64 -125 +101 46.6% -0.48 5–2 (71%) 5–0 (100%) 107.1 -1.31
27 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 1988 1671 122.3 — — — — -30 — +140 37.9% -1.00 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 -0.54
28 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 1989 1615 115.8 — — — — -3 -48 +119 39.3% -0.82 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 100.6 +0.21
29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 1990 1567 104.6 — — — — +6 — +169 25.0% -1.68 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 -0.13
30 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19 1992 1552 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
32 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 — 1856 137.2 — — — — -4 -116 +17 44.9% -0.33 59–44 (57%) 42–41 (51%) 107.1 -2.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.