H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pam Whytcross vs Heidi Eisterlehner H2H: 3-0
Pam Whytcross holds a 3–0 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pam Whytcross leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Whytcross won the 1982 Tokyo Japan Open fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 1982* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Pam Whytcross | 6-4 6-3 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
| Dec 30, 1976* | New South Wales | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Pam Whytcross | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1976* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Pam Whytcross | 6-4 6-3 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Whytcross | #154 | #150 | — | 1,630 | 66 | 116 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pam Whytcross | Heidi Eisterlehner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 2–16 | 11.1% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1980 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1983 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1984 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |