H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pam Whytcross vs Lele Forood H2H: 1-1
Pam Whytcross and Lele Forood are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Whytcross leads 1–0 on clay, while Lele Forood leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lele Forood won the 1982 Birmingham second round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 1982* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Lele Forood | 7-6 6-4 | Pam Whytcross | Match data |
| May 26, 1977* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Pam Whytcross | 6-1 6-0 | Lele Forood | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Whytcross | #154 | #150 | — | 1,630 | 66 | 116 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Lele Forood | — | — | — | 1,684 | 54 | 96 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pam Whytcross | Lele Forood | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 4–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1973 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1974 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1976 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1977 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1978 | 2–16 | 11.1% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1979 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1983 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1984 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |